Senator Doesn't Buy FCC Justification for Killing Net Neutrality

Authored by dslreports.com and submitted by maxwellhill

Senator Doesn't Buy FCC Justification for Killing Net Neutrality

Senator Edward Markey this week questioned FCC boss Ajit Pai's justifications for killing popular net neutrality rules in a hearing in Washington this week. We've noted repeatedly that while large ISPs claim net neutrality killed broadband investment, objective analysis repeatedly finds that to be a lie. That's not just based on publicly-available SEC filings and earnings reports, but the industry's own repeated comments to investors and analysts.

But that doesn't stop AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Charter (and the ocean of politicians, think tankers, consultants and other PR vessels they employ to make this misleading argument in the media on a daily basis) from making the claim anyway.

And while Pai once again this week breathlessly proclaimed that net neutrality put a damper on network investment, Markey simply wasn't having it.

"Publicly traded companies are required by law to provide investors accurate financial information, including reporting any risks or financial burdens," Markey said. "However, I have found no publicly traded ISP that has reported to its investors by law that Title II has negatively impacted investment in their networks. Many, in fact, have increased deployment and investment."

But Pai's NPRM for his plan to kill net neutrality proceeds as if this investment reduction is fact, which Wyden repeatedly contested. He also questioned if there's any substantive evidence to justifying repealing the popular protections at all.

"I feel that the evidence [to repeal the rules] right now is not there and if it was, the broadband companies themselves would have in fact been providing that evidence to their investors in their filings, and they have not done so," Wyden said. "Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. There is no factual basis for that change."

Despite more than 10.5 million comments on Pai's plan to kill net neutrality protections (the majority in opposition to the plan), Pai is expected to ignore the public and push for a final vote to kill the rules later this year.

pfranz on July 21st, 2017 at 18:41 UTC »

In case there's any question about the kinds of things ISPs will do, here's a modified repost of a comment /u/Skrattybones made in a previous thread:

2005 - Madison River Communications was blocking VOIP services. The FCC put a stop to it.

2005 - Comcast was denying access to p2p services without notifying customers.

2007-2009 - AT&T was having Skype and other VOIPs blocked because they didn't like there was competition for their cellphones.

2011 - MetroPCS tried to block all streaming except youtube. (they actually sued the FCC over this)

2011 - 7 different ISPs were caught redirecting users' search requests to a service called PAXFIRE which served advertisements and sponsored web pages to users in lieu of their requested pages.

2011-2013, AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon were blocking access to Google Wallet because it competed with their bullshit. This one happened literally months after the trio were busted collaborating with Google to block apps from the android marketplace.

2012, Verizon was demanding google block tethering apps on android because it let owners avoid their $20 tethering fee. This was despite guaranteeing they wouldn't do that as part of a winning bid on an airwaves auction. They were fined $1.25million over this

2012, AT&T - tried to block access to FaceTime unless customers paid more money.

2013, Verizon literally stated that the only thing stopping them from favoring some content providers over other providers were the net neutrality rules in place.

2017, Time Warner Cable refused to upgrade lines in order to get more money out of Riot Games (League of Legends) and Netflix

snowcrash512 on July 21st, 2017 at 18:04 UTC »

You see the problem here is everything Net Neutrality supporters are doing to fight this is what they are supposed to do.

What Pai is doing on the other hand is not what he is supposed to do, he is ignoring public input, he is ignoring the people questioning his logic. He is literally just doing what HE wants to do because thats what the money tells him to do, no matter how much we follow the rules and speak up against, it doesnt matter because he literally doesnt care about anybodies opinion but his own and those that are handing him millions of dollars. He has already shown that he is TOTALLY fine with lying and manipulating the system anyway he pleases because he is in control and Trump sure as hell isnt going to fire him, so 90 percent of the population could tell him no and he would still ignore us because he doesnt care about us in the slightest bit, he doesnt have to, he is "protected"

fantasyfest on July 21st, 2017 at 16:28 UTC »

Pai is lying, but he will still kill neutrality.