Senators to introduce bill to prohibit teams from using municipal bonds to fund stadiums

Authored by espn.com and submitted by getthetime

A group of politicians who are tired of taxpayer money being used to build sports stadiums on Tuesday will introduce a bill in the Senate to prohibit the practice.

Cory Booker, D-N.J., and James Lankford, R-Okla., are sponsoring a bill that would prohibit teams from using municipal bonds, whose interest is exempt from federal taxes, to help finance stadium construction.

"Professional sports teams generate billions of dollars in revenue," Booker said in a statement. "There's no reason why we should give these multimillion-dollar businesses a federal tax break to build new stadiums. It's not fair to finance these expensive projects on the backs of taxpayers, especially when wealthy teams end up reaping most of the benefits."

A report in September by the Brookings Institution revealed that $3.2 billion in federal taxpayer money, through municipal bonds, has been used to fund 36 newly built or renovated sports stadiums since 2000. The largest federal subsidies, according to the report, include the New York Yankees ($431 million), the Chicago Bears ($205 million), the New York Mets ($185 million), the Cincinnati Bengals ($164 million) and the Indianapolis Colts ($163 million).

"Everyone likes free federal money to build their expensive stadiums, but with $20 trillion in federal debt, this is waste that needs to be eliminated," Lankford said in a statement.

A similar bill was introduced by Congressman Steve Russell, R-Okla., into the House of Representatives in March 2016.

JJ4prez on June 13rd, 2017 at 15:06 UTC »

I never understood it personally, if it's taxpayer funded, why do we pay so much money to enter and enjoy the game?

tims4myhooligans on June 13rd, 2017 at 14:45 UTC »

It'd be nice if this happens. Taxpayers help build beautiful stadiums, yet ticket prices keep increasing. Where is the benefit to the average Joe? Corporations get a nice financial break. Shoot, just cause you have a sweet stadium or areana doesn't mean you will be a success. Look at the Orlando Magic. This arena is gorgeous! They suck. Thankfully, concerts and other events help keep it full which helps the local economy.

latourist21 on June 13rd, 2017 at 13:35 UTC »

This needs to happen. If taxpayers are the ones on the hook for the stadium, then taxpayers should be reaping the rewards. Ask anyone from St. Louis if they think this is a good idea...