P.E.I. man wants to know why he pays HST on electricity he generates himself

Authored by cbc.ca and submitted by bilalhouri

Every aspect of Kris Currie's home in New Dominion, P.E.I., was designed to minimize energy usage — from the thickness of the walls, to the position of the windows, to the choice of appliances, like a heat pump-powered clothes dryer.

Even the paint colour on the interior walls was chosen to reflect natural sunlight, so no lights have to be on during daytime.

The result is what's known as a "net-zero home," meant to generate all the power it needs over a year from the 35 solar panels on the roof.

What Currie didn't know when he built the home is that "net-zero" doesn't apply when it comes to the HST.

Currie pays nothing to Maritime Electric for his electricity, but is still billed for the HST on every kilowatt hour used, just like any other customer.

"It's nonsense really. It should be exempt," Currie said. "We're using it for heat, for one. Oil's exempt. Now that we're producing electricity we're getting charged for it."

The 35 solar panels on Currie's home are meant to generate all the electricity needed to power the home over the course of a year. (Randy McAndrew/CBC)

While heating oil is exempt from HST on P.E.I., other energy sources for heating such as wood — or electricity — are not.

Currie is part of P.E.I.'s net metering program, which allows individual homeowners to generate their own electricity, sending any excess into the grid in exchange for credits so they don't have to pay when they draw electricity back out of the grid — for example, at night when solar power can't be generated.

Currie's home is generating more electricity than it uses, feeding the excess into P.E.I.'s electricity grid, where it's sold to other Maritime Electric customers — who pay HST on what they use.

For April, Currie's bill shows he paid $13.49 HST on the 644 kilowatt hours of electricity he used — a third of the electricity his home produced over that period.

In the winter, when his electricity usage increases, Currie said he'll be paying $50 or $60 a month in HST.

He said he spent an extra $46,000, without government assistance, to build a net-zero home. In fact, he paid HST on the solar panels and the labour to have them installed.

He did it, said Currie, partly to save on his monthly bills, but also to reduce his family's carbon footprint.

Currie paid $13.49 in HST to Maritime Electric on his April bill. (Randy McAndrew/CBC)

But the added tax means it will take longer for that investment to pay off, and he said that will discourage other homeowners from doing the same thing.

"Everybody's on a cost basis when they go to build a house or retrofit a house or try and reduce their energy consumption," he said.

"It all goes into cost at the end of the day, how many years payback will you get? …The quicker we can get a payback, the quicker this stuff's going to get produced."

The provincial government and Maritime Electric both told CBC News that federal tax law requires HST be charged to homeowners involved in net metering.

They said homeowners could claim back the HST by registering as a business, although Currie said his accountant advised him the extra costs and paperwork involved in doing that would cancel out the benefits.

Currie paid HST on the 644 kilowatt hours of electricity he used in April, only a third of the electricity his home produced over that period. (Randy McAndrew/CBC)

The provincial government did say it has commissioned a review of the electrical grid, which could lead to changes to the net-metering program.

tubush on June 1st, 2017 at 05:14 UTC »

This isn't at all crazy, he gains all the benefits from the grid as an ITC, I should pay nothing for a service he benefits from.

astrawso on June 1st, 2017 at 03:52 UTC »

This isn't at all crazy, he is still using the grid to recieve his electricity and upkeep is required to keep it running. Really the right solution here is for a montly grid connection fee that pays for infrastructure investment for people like this guy, with a subsequent decrease in the cost associated with generating electricity.

Scoots1919 on June 1st, 2017 at 02:45 UTC »

I understand the frustration, but net zero still means he is using the grid.

If I bought a tomato from the grocery store, then the next day sold one of my tomatoes I grew in my garden back to the store, I am tomato net zero but I still pay tax on the one i bought (and the one I sell?).

He's probably right though, making an exception could help incentivize more power producers and slightly lower the time for complete ROI.