8 in 10 people now see climate change as a “catastrophic risk” – survey

Authored by news.trust.org and submitted by pnewell
image for 8 in 10 people now see climate change as a “catastrophic risk” – survey

"I really hope that political leaders will realise the mandate they seem to have to act" on the problem"

LONDON, May 24 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Nearly nine in 10 people say they are ready to make changes to their standard of living if it would prevent future climate catastrophe, a survey on global threats found Wednesday.

The survey of more than 8,000 people in eight countries – the United States, China, India, Britain, Australia, Brazil, South Africa and Germany – found that 84 percent of people now consider climate change a "global catastrophic risk".

That puts worry about climate change only slightly behind fears about large-scale environmental damage and the threat of politically motivated violence escalating into war, according to the Global Challenges Foundation, which commissioned the Global Catastrophic Risks 2017 report.

But it indicates that many people now see climate change as a bigger threat than other traditional or rising concerns such as epidemics, population growth, use of weapons of mass destruction and the rise of artificial intelligence threats.

On climate and environmental issues, "there's certainly a huge gap between what people expect from politicians and what politicians are doing. It's stunning," said Mats Andersson, vice chairman of the Stockholm-based foundation, in a telephone interview with the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

The survey, released in advance of this week's G7 summit of advanced economies in Italy, also found that 85 percent of people think the United Nations needs reforms to be better equipped to address global threats.

About 70 percent of those surveyed said they think it may be time to create a new global organisation – with power to enforce its decisions – specifically designed to deal with a wide range of global risks. Nearly 60 percent said they would be prepared to have their country give up some level of sovereignty to make that happen.

"Whether it's the spectre of nuclear conflict over North Korea or the planet tipping into catastrophic climate change, the need for effective global cooperation has never been greater," Andersson said.

The Global Challenges Foundation, created in 2012 by a Swedish risk specialist and philanthropist, looks for more effective solutions to cross-border problems and ways to resolve the mismatch between long-term problems and short-term political and market focuses.

Following the G7 meeting, U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to make a decision about whether to pull the United States out of the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change, aimed at keeping global temperature increases to relatively safe levels.

But the Global Challenges Foundation found that 84 percent of the Americans it surveyed would be prepared to make changes in their current living standards if it would prevent future climate catastrophes, such as irreversible melting of Arctic and Greenland ice, with accompanying large-scale sea level rise.

Nearly two in three Americans also agreed with the statement that "a single individual can negatively impact global cooperation on risks". Respondents in other parts of the world – apart from South Africa – were less likely to agree.

That environmental issues and climate change now rank near the top of global worries about catastrophic threats for many people suggests "something has shifted in the past couple of years", Andersson said. "I really hope that political leaders will realise the mandate they seem to have to act."

The report looked at a wide range of potential global catastrophes, from use of nuclear weapons to ecological collapse, asteroid impacts and the potential attempts to manipulate the world's atmosphere and biological systems to deal with runaway climate change, in a process known as geoengineering.

Geoengineering is dangerous, the report noted, because "its deployment could have dramatic impacts on climate stability", because one country or individual could unilaterally attempt it, and because "there are currently no governance frameworks to manage the risks". (Reporting by Laurie Goering @lauriegoering; editing by Alex Whiting:; Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, climate change, resilience, women's rights, trafficking and property rights. Visit http://news.trust.org/climate)

whatthefuckingwhat on May 24th, 2017 at 19:47 UTC »

I just wonder how many people have experienced things that makes them believe in climate change,

In my small city of under 150000 people we have,over the past 10 years, had a once in a 100 year flood 3 TIMES and even after installing flood defences the last flood went over the top of them rather easily.

unlawfulsoup on May 24th, 2017 at 15:53 UTC »

I wonder what the number of people who would be willing to accept large scale regulations in an effort to avoid/lessen it.

worksonotme on May 24th, 2017 at 13:48 UTC »

This would have been really useful, 25 years ago.