Pediatricians take aim at juice: It 'has no essential role in healthy, balanced diets of children'

Authored by latimes.com and submitted by Tomino_98
image for Pediatricians take aim at juice: It 'has no essential role in healthy, balanced diets of children'

The American Academy of Pediatrics has some new advice about juice: Kids should resist the urge to drink it.

If you’re craving something fruity and refreshing, try eating a piece of fruit instead. If you’re thirsty, you can wash it down with some water.

Sure, juice has some things going for it. It can be an excellent source of vitamin C, vitamin A and potassium, among other nutrients. It also contains antioxidants, which may help ward off cancer and cardiovascular disease.

All those things are true about fruit as well — plus it contains fiber. That’s good for you because it helps keep your blood sugar in check, reduces cholesterol and cleans your colon. And it can help prevent unwanted weight gain, since it takes much longer to eat a piece of fruit than it does to drink the juice it contains.

Juice comes from fruit, but that doesn't mean it's the nutritional equivalent. New advice from pediatricians explains why. (Eric Boyd / Los Angeles Times)

Fruit also beats juice when it comes to fighting tooth decay. When kids carry around sippy cups with juice — or worse, take it to bed with them in a bottle — their teeth are continuously exposed to carbohydrates. That leads to cavities.

Despite all this, juice remains a popular beverage for kids and teens. For Americans between the ages of 2 and 18, almost half of the fruit they consume is in the form of juice

That needs to change, pediatricians say. The Academy’s position statement, released Monday, boils it down succinctly: “Fruit juice offers no nutritional advantage over whole fruit.”

Here’s a look at the new advice and how it breaks down for kids of different ages:

No juice at all. Zip. Zilch.

For about the first six months of life, the only thing that should pass an infant’s lips is breast milk or infant formula. (The Academy prefers breast milk but says formula is an acceptable alternative.)

“No additional nutrients are needed,” the statement says.

If caregivers substitute juice for milk or formula, babies risk missing out on all the protein, essential fats and nutrients like calcium, iron and zinc that their growing bodies require. So not only is juice not helpful, it actually can be harmful, the pediatricians warn.

The only food or drink babies need in the first six months of life is breast milk or infant formula, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. (Getty images)

Babies in this age group start eating solid foods, and fruit – often mashed or pureed – should become part of their diet. But in most cases, liquids should be restricted to breast milk, formula or water.

“It is optimal to completely avoid the use of juice in infants before 1 year of age,” the statement says.

If parents opt to give their babies juice anyway, the pediatricians offer this advice:

Limit juice intake to 4 ounces per day.

Serve juice in a cup, not a bottle.

Do not put babies to bed with juice that they can sip throughout the night.

If the goal is to rehydrate a baby with acute gastroenteritis, use electrolyte solutions instead of juice.

One of the problems with giving juice to infants and toddlers is the risk of tooth decay. (Jill Torrance / Associated Press)

The Academy warns parents that they start out at a disadvantage when it comes to keeping juice away from toddlers and preschool-age children.

“Fruit juice and fruit drinks are easily overconsumed by toddlers and young children because they taste good,” the statement says. “In addition, they are conveniently packaged or can be placed in a bottle or transportable covered cup and carried around during the day.”

But parents should not give in. They should continue to encourage their kids to eat whole fruit instead of drinking juice. (Pediatricians, too, are encouraged to support public policies that back fruit over juice.)

To drive home its point, the Academy compares juice to sugary soda pop: “Like soda, it can contribute to energy imbalance.” (That’s doctor-speak for consuming too many calories.)

The older children get, the more ubiquitous juice becomes. Still, parents should avoid giving it to their kids, pediatricians say. (Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times)

If parents insist on serving juice, they should limit it to 4 ounces per day for children between ages 1 and 3, and to 6 ounces per day for those 4 to 6.

Parents should also make sure the juice has been pasteurized, the Academy advises. If not, kids risk exposure to dangerous pathogens like E. coli, Salmonella and Crytposporidium.

By age 7, children typically consume less juice, so there’s less for parents to worry about. Even so, they should not drink more than 8 ounces of juice per day — and amount that represents half of the daily calories that should come from fruit.

Kids and parents should also keep in mind that fruit juice and fruit drinks are not the same. Anything other than 100% juice must be labeled as a juice “drink,” “cocktail” or “beverage.” These items may be fortified with vitamins or calcium, but they may also contain added sugars and other flavors.

Some studies have found an association between heavy juice consumption — in excess of 12 ounces per day — and obesity. However, other research has found that kids who drank more juice had lower BMIs than kids who drank less juice — and still others found no link between juice and obesity at all.

“More research is required to better define this relationship,” the statement says.

Kids at any age should eat whole fruit instead of drinking juice, pediatricians advise. (Mark Boster / Los Angeles Times)

In the meantime, you won’t go wrong if you remember this:

“Fruit juice,” the Academy says, “has no essential role in healthy, balanced diets of children.”

Support our journalism Already a subscriber? Thank you for your support. If you are not, please consider subscribing today. Get full access to our signature journalism for just 99 cents for the first four weeks.

Follow me on Twitter @LATkarenkaplan and "like" Los Angeles Times Science & Health on Facebook.

In 2016, scientists discovered 18,000 new species. Now meet the Top 10

Southern California, this is your chance to see some of the most 'extreme' mammals that ever lived

Rising sea levels could mean twice as much flood risk in Los Angeles and other coastal cities

NotFakeRussian on May 23rd, 2017 at 09:32 UTC »

Here is the link to the 'policy statement' from the American Academy of Pediatrics that the article is based on.

"Although juice consumption has some benefits, it also has potential detrimental effects. High sugar content in juice contributes to increased calorie consumption and the risk of dental caries. In addition, the lack of protein and fiber in juice can predispose to inappropriate weight gain (too much or too little). Pediatricians need to be knowledgeable about juice to inform parents and patients on its appropriate uses."

"data revealed that children 2 to 18 years of age consume nearly half of their fruit intake as juice, which lacks dietary fiber and predisposes to excessive caloric intake."

Conclusions

1 Fruit juice offers no nutritional benefits for infants younger than 1 year.

2 Fruit juice offers no nutritional benefits over whole fruit for infants and children and has no essential role in healthy, balanced diets of children.

3 One hundred percent fresh or reconstituted fruit juice can be a healthy part of the diet of children older than 1 year when consumed as part of a well-balanced diet. Fruit drinks, however, are not nutritionally equivalent to fruit juice.

4 Juice is not appropriate in the treatment of dehydration or the management of diarrhea.

5 Excessive juice consumption may be associated with malnutrition (overnutrition and undernutrition).

6 Excessive juice consumption is associated with diarrhea, flatulence, abdominal distention, and tooth decay.

7 Unpasteurized juice products may contain pathogens that can cause serious illnesses and should be given to children cautiously, if at all.

8 A variety of fruit juices, provided in appropriate amounts for a child’s age, are not likely to cause any significant clinical symptoms.

9 Calcium-fortified juices provide a bioavailable source of calcium and often vitamin D but lack other nutrients present in human milk, infant formula, or cow milk.

Arcanum-Arcanorum on May 23rd, 2017 at 09:02 UTC »

If anyone feels qualified to answer, I would like to know:

Are fruit & vegetable smoothies (with no added sugar) significantly better than just pure juice, or are they usually just as bad?

Sorry if that is a stupid question, but I had always assumed that smoothies were at least a little bit more healthy because they (presumably) still contain a lot of the fiber and 'flesh' from the fruits & vegetables.

WickedWicky on May 23rd, 2017 at 08:25 UTC »

I could steal some posts, rephrase statements by others and spread false information because of my lack of detailed knowledge on this.

Or I could link the thread from a day ago that has some solid discussion about the difference of sugar in eaten fruit and fruit juice. https://www.reddit.com/r/Fitness/comments/6cmhdi/is_added_sugar_really_bad_for_you_if_so_why/