NASA's mission to Mars includes a year-long stay on the moon

Authored by engadget.com and submitted by Portis403

If everything goes well, phase 2 will begin in 2027. NASA will start by sending a Deep Space Transport vehicle to cislunar space, followed by the crew who'll live in the habitat for a year. If you'll recall, the agency asked six private corporations to design space vehicles for it as part of the NextSTEP program. Boeing conjured up designs for a transport vehicle and a habitat. We're guessing they're some of the candidates for what the agency plans to accomplish.

Future manned missions to Mars, which could happen in the 2030s, will then take off from the moon using the Deep Space Transport vehicle. Before any of these could take place, though, the agency has to finish building the Space Launch System (SLS) first, since it aims to use the massive rocket to launch those payloads. If the rocket's development gets delayed even further, it could impact the plan, too, unless NASA decides to use the heavy rockets private space corporations are also building.

So, how much will going to Mars ultimately cost the agency? In the same event, Pascal Lee, director of the NASA-funded non-profit Mars Institute, said it could cost $1 trillion over the course of 25 years. It's a "matter of opinion" and a "ballpark figure," he said, based on the $24 billion the agency spent on the Apollo program for over a decade. That's $197 billion in today's money when adjusted for inflation.

Since Mars missions are expected to be a lot more complex than missions to the moon, he said you'll have to multiply that amount "by a factor of 2 or 3." That's why Buzz Aldrin believes that to be able to go forward with the plan, NASA should hand over its ISS activities to the private sector ASAP, since it "simply cannot afford $3.5 billion a year of that cost."

redkingca on May 11st, 2017 at 20:33 UTC »

NASA makes lots of plans all the time. Planning is not noteworthy. Once they actually start to reveal actual designs(not just "possible" prototypes) and announce that the program has a budget; then I would take an interest. (And at that time most likely congress with reduce that budget, and then complain that NASA never does anything worthwhile.)

MetaParser on May 11st, 2017 at 18:32 UTC »

Isn't ESA with other countries planning to make a lunar base ?

My_Big_Mouth on May 11st, 2017 at 18:23 UTC »

Can you imagine living on the moon for a year, fucking hell.