Sources: Former Acting AG Yates to contradict administration about Flynn at hearing

Authored by cnn.com and submitted by Whoshabooboo
image for Sources: Former Acting AG Yates to contradict administration about Flynn at hearing

Washington (CNN) Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is prepared to testify before a Senate panel next week that she gave a forceful warning to the White House regarding then-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn nearly three weeks before he was fired, contradicting the administration's version of events, sources familiar with her account tell CNN.

In a private meeting January 26, Yates told White House Counsel Don McGahn that Flynn was lying when he denied in public and private that he had discussed US sanctions on Russia in conversations with Russian Ambassador to the US Sergei Kislyak. Flynn's misleading comments, Yates said, made him potentially vulnerable to being compromised by Russia, according to sources familiar with her version of events. She expressed "serious concerns" to McGahn, making it clear -- without making a recommendation -- that Flynn could be fired.

Yates' testimony May 8 will be the first time the former acting attorney general will publicly speak about the White House meeting. A source familiar with the situation says that Yates will be limited on what she can tell the Senate judiciary subcommittee because many of the details involving Flynn are classified, meaning there may only be a few new revelations.

Yates would not comment ahead of the testimony.

Her previously scheduled appearance in front of the House intelligence committee was canceled by its chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-California, who said he wanted to hear first in a classified setting from FBI Director James Comey and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers. Nunes' move to cancel the hearing sparked outcry from Democrats, who believed he was trying to shield the White House from damaging new revelations.

Whoshabooboo on May 3rd, 2017 at 00:29 UTC »

Keep in mind Sally Yates was fired just weeks later. The administration claims it because she would not defend the travel ban, but it is now clear they had other motives to do so. Flynn was kept on staff despite them having this information and NOTHING was done until the Washington Post broke the story about his Russia meetings. Pence knew, Trump knew, they all knew. They will try to get away with whatever they can till they are caught.

mtn_mojo on May 2nd, 2017 at 23:38 UTC »

It just blows my mind that if this were happening to a Democratic administration, this would be an order of magnitude bigger than the whole Benghazi thing. It would be absolutely non-stop outrage from the right.

Ladderjack on May 2nd, 2017 at 23:30 UTC »

The Republicans hold majority in the Senate, the House of Representatives, governorships and state legislatures. This might be true. Other allegations might be true. . .but no one who is in a position to do anything will take action.