Jordan: No more pardons for rapists who marry their victims

Authored by dw.com and submitted by maxwellhill
image for Jordan: No more pardons for rapists who marry their victims

For Jordan's MPs, it was time. In a bold move, the Jordanian government decided to change one of the most controversial articles in the country's laws. Article 308 had been a source of contention for years. It permitted rapists to go unpunished as long as they married their victims and stayed with them for at least three years.

Opposition to the law had been growing for some time, and numerous international organizations shared in the criticism. They say it was partly behind the recent increase in the number of so-called honor killings: family members of the victim say they often didn't know what else to do, and so took matters into their own hands.

The decision by parliament follows an awareness campaign mounted by both Muslim and Christian activists. For years, women's rights activists in Jordan have been calling for Article 308 to be changed. They say it represented a double punishment for female victims of rape: first the rape itself, then being forced to wed their attacker.

Women's rights activists demonstrating against Article 522 in Lebanon

"The decision that's been made now is the result of years of activism for better legal protection for women," said Jordanian women's rights activist Amal Jaber al-Atrash. "But as important as this is, there are still numerous loopholes in the law. Women who get pregnant as a result of rape are still unprotected because the rapist is not obligated to provide for a child that is born out of rape."

She says there are varying opinions over why Article 308 and other laws like it were introduced in the Arab world. One theory is that the law was designed to protect a victim's reputation, but Atrash has another explanation. She says the goal was to bring the problem of rape into the legal sphere, but the end effect was that rapists enjoyed legal protection - not victims.

Legal situation in other Arab countries

Morocco has a different situation. There, rapists are punished with a prison sentence of between five and 20 years. In 2014, the country scrapped a provision offering pardons to rapists who married their victims. The change was prompted by the case of 16-year-old Amina Filali. In 2012, she was forced to marry her rapist, prompting her to commit suicide by swallowing rat poison. The case sparked outrage both in Morocco and abroad. Human rights organizations got involved, and began demanding a change to the law protecting rapists.

Change also appears to be underway in Lebanon. In mid-April, activists staged a protest, hanging wedding dresses from nooses along a beach in Beirut to press lawmakers into scrapping Article 522 from the country's penal code, which stipulates that rapists marry their victims as a sort of "reparation." No statistics exist on such cases in Lebanon, but the law is still valid, particularly in rural regions. "Every day, women have to fear being raped, and then forced to marry their abusers," said Alia Awada. She heads a campaign called "Abad" ("Distance"), which is working to have Article 522 abolished.

An image from Lebanon's "No Means No" campaign raising awareness about domestic violence

Victims often subject to legal persecution

Things work differently in Saudi Arabia. The country doesn't have a penal code; crimes are punished under Sharia law. Previous punishments have ranged from lashes to the death penalty. But if the crime took place in a location where women are not permitted, then the victim is also punished.

Sudan, too, has tough regulations for the victims of rape. If a woman reports a rape, she must also reckon with some form of punishment. She has to prove that the act took place against her will. If she fails to do so, she will also face charges.

Tunisia also offers pardons to rapists who marry their victims under a provision known as Article 227. The International Court has called for the article to be abolished, but of 100 political parties, only 32 voted in favor, meaning that Article 227 can still be enforced.

Legal change is just the first step

Human rights activists are now hoping that the vote to change the law in Jordan will lead to similar reforms in other Arab countries. "However, there is still a whole range of other laws that undermine the rights of women," said Jordanian activist Atrash. She says that scrapping legal protection for rapists is just the first step down a much longer path of reform.

wanker75 on April 29th, 2017 at 04:05 UTC »

To those wondering, countries where this law still exists include:

Iraq, Syria, Tanzania, Eritrea, Cameroon, Tunisia, Libya, Angola, Philippines, Tajikistan. I believe Lebanon also has this law but I couldn't find any data on it, just articles stating that the law still exists.

Countries that have similar laws (as in concessions for rapists who marry their victims) include:

Belgium, Greece, Russia, Thailand and Malaysia.

I'm sure there are more countries in the second list but these are the ones explicitly mentioned.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/20/decoder-the-rapists-loophole-marriage/

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/mar/06/women-un-member-states-failed-by-rape-laws-sexual-violence-study-equality-now

Tettrox on April 29th, 2017 at 02:13 UTC »

As long as Jordan doesn't pull a Turkey, I think they just got on a good path! Hopefully we'll see more of this in other Arabic countries.

SandpaperIsBadTP on April 29th, 2017 at 01:44 UTC »

Why was that ever a thing?