ISPs Gave 8X More Cash to Politician That Axed FCC Privacy Rule

ISPs Gave 8X More Cash to Politician That Axed FCC Privacy Rule

Most people realize that Congress' party-line vote to kill the FCC's consumer broadband privacy rules earlier this month was a clear, albeit grotesque, example of pay-to-play American politics. Especially given the majority of Republicans, Democrats and Independents alike thought the rules should have remained in place. But how overt of a display of pay-to-play politics was it? The Intercept looked at campaign finance filings and found that the Senators and Representatives that voted to kill the rules received significantly more cash from broadband providers.

quote: A Verizon political action committee filing shows that most lawmakers received between $500 and $1,000 from the firm during the first three months of this year. But Flake received $8,000 and Blackburn received $4,500. Blackburn received $5,000 from the CTIA, the most of any House member. Speaker Paul Ryan only received $2,500 from the group during the same time period...The US Telecom Association, which includes CenturyLink and Verizon, also singled out Blackburn for more donations than any other lawmaker in the beginning of this year, providing $3,000 to her campaign account.

Arizona Senator Jeff Flake and Tennessee Representative Marsha Blackburn were of a particular focus for large ISP lobbying organizations (specifically the CTIA and the US Telecom Association) and their campaign contributions:Of course many Tennessee residents are familiar with Blackburn's particular brand of " help ," especially her support of state level laws -- usually quite literally written by AT&T and Comcast -- that prohibit towns and cities from improving their local broadband networks. Blackburn was recently tagged to replace Greg Walden as the head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, bringing her particular brand of state-level "assistance" to the federal level.

ISPs and their DC hirelings have tried to argue in lockstep that the FCC rule repeal was no big deal because the FTC will somehow step in to protect consumers. They fail to tell you that the FTC doesn't have authority over broadband providers, can't make new rules, and AT&T's lawyers have already found a way around FTC oversight via common carrier exemptions. In short: the broadband industry's stranglehold over the Congress is going to result in less regulatory oversight than ever over one of the least competitive markets in America.

And they're not done yet. Next up: using their power and financial influence to kill net neutrality , despite the idea's broad, bipartisan support among consumers.