Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google.
Add AP News on Google Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Share
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — Malaysia on Monday began enforcing rules barring millions of children younger than 16 from having social media accounts, joining a growing global effort to tighten safety protections. Not all families approved, and critics raised concerns about data protection and potential surveillance.
Social media platforms with at least 8 million users in Malaysia, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, must implement age-verification systems and block users under 16 from creating accounts.
Malaysia’s Communications and Multimedia Commission said age verification for existing users will be rolled out over the next six months. Users identified as under 16 will have a month to download or transfer data, including photos and videos, before restrictions or other actions are applied.
Companies that fail to comply could face penalties of up to 10 million ringgit ($2.5 million). Parents whose children manage to bypass the law will not be penalized.
The government said the measures are aimed at protecting children from harmful content, cyberbullying and platform features designed to encourage excessive use.
Countries including Australia,Brazil and Indonesia have introduced or announced age-based restrictions or requirements for children’s access to social media. Others including Britain, France, Spain, Denmark, Thailand and South Korea are studying or developing similar approaches.
Malaysia’s regulator said the rules are not intended to prevent children from accessing digital technology. Platforms are required to improve user safety, discourage excessive use and take action against underage accounts and harmful content.
Technology companies have yet to describe how they will comply.
Clara Koh, Meta’s director of public policy for Southeast Asia, has cautioned that Malaysia’s under-16 ban could backfire by driving teenagers away from protected apps and into unregulated corners of the internet.
Governments around the world face pressure to address concerns about social media’s impact on children’s mental health and online safety. In March, a U.S. jury ordered Meta and YouTube to pay millions of dollars in damages in a case alleging that platform design features contributed to harm suffered by a young user.
In Kuala Lumpur, Saravanan Ganasan and Jayaradha Veerasamy, whose children are 12 and 15, said they approve of the changes. They already had banned their kids from using social media, believing minors lack the psychological capacity to cope with it.
Devices are kept out of bedrooms, screen time is limited to common areas and their son is not allowed to lock his phone with a password.
“Exposure is what we fear,” Saravanan said. “The wrong kind of exposure will do damage to the mind.”
Aadhavan Saravanan, 15, said he believes he would be addicted to social media if allowed full freedom. “Social media is, like, a luxury and it’s not a necessity,” he said.
The couple said the restrictions have forced their children to develop offline life skills. Aadhavan reads books in a backyard mango tree and repairs broken household appliances, while their daughter cooks and does crafts.
“A lot of parents are very scared that children get bored,” Jayaradha said. “But boredom is actually very good because they start thinking out of the box.”
But Shaun Hew, in the Kuala Lumpur suburb of Cheras, said the new restrictions go too far.
Hew believes social media allow his kids to spend time productively, as long as there is proper adult oversight. His 11-year-old son uses platforms to learn cooking and his daughter, 14, uses YouTube for exam preparation.
He worries a sudden cutoff could cause teenagers to rebel and find unregulated ways to bypass internet blocks.
Some express concerns over privacy and safety
Some critics said Malaysia’s decision could increase the risks of data privacy breaches and expand state surveillance.
“It is very much following the trend, but in a way that is raising alarms due to requiring a government ID for age verification,” said Benjamin Loh, social science lecturer at Monash University in Malaysia. He said social media companies could end up storing sensitive personal data without sufficient safeguards.
Loh said the decision also could unintentionally affect stateless individuals, undocumented residents and members of marginalized communities including LGBTQ+ people who rely on anonymity online for safety.
Without penalties on parents, families can easily bypass the law by creating accounts for their children, he added.
“This is a major gap that, unless regulators are willing to fix, will result in the law having little effect in stopping children from using social media,” he said.
RelChan2_0 on June 1st, 2026 at 04:11 UTC »
I’m still in the belief that it should be the parents’ responsibility. I grew up with the internet, my parents knew what a computer did but not what the internet could do. I had access to the internet as early as 13 but my parents told me not to talk to strangers or anyone older than me. I’m 32 now, I still have this in my head despite being an adult. Kids nowadays get blasted by social media as early as they can hold an iPad.
truthfulie on June 1st, 2026 at 03:41 UTC »
did it work for aussies?
defiant-raven on June 1st, 2026 at 03:38 UTC »
How does anyone really enforce this? Couldn't they just get an older friend / sibling to help?
Edit: I've been to Asia several times including Malaysia. There's a mixture of mainly Malay, Chinese and Indian populations, the main religion being Sunni Islam. I'm saying generally. Though if you need more stringent forms of ID than a license or picture showing you're an adult then yes, I can see it being more effective.
The article specifically states: "Technology companies have yet to describe how they will comply."
I still feel like my comment is relevant as there's no agreed upon plan at this time.