The Daily Populous Thursday March 26th, 2026 day edition
Authored by bbc.co.uk and submitted by SteamerTheBeemer

During his appearance before the jury in February, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's chairman and chief executive, relied on his company's longstanding policy of not allowing users under the age of 13 on any of its platforms.

When presented with internal research and documents showing that Meta knew young children were, in fact, using its platforms, Zuckerberg said he "always wished" for faster progress to identify users under 13. He insisted the company had reached the "right place over time".

While Google, as the owner of video-sharing site YouTube, was also a defendant in the case, most of the trial proceedings focused on Instagram and Meta.

Snap and TikTok were also initially defendants, but both companies reached undisclosed settlements with Kaley prior to trial.

As for Kaley's lawyers, they argued that Meta and YouTube had built "addiction machines" and failed in their responsibility to prevent children from accessing their platforms.

Kaley said she started using Instagram aged nine and YouTube aged six, and encountered no attempts to block her because of her age.

"I stopped engaging with family because I was spending all my time on social media," Kaley said during her testimony.

Kaley said she was 10 years old when she started having feelings of anxiety and depression, disorders for which she would be diagnosed years later by a therapist.

She also started to obsess about her physical appearance and began using Instagram filters that would change the way she looked – making her nose smaller and her eyes bigger – almost as soon as she started using the platform as a child.

Kaley has since been diagnosed with body dysmorphia, a condition which causes people to worry excessively about their physical appearance and prevents them from seeing themselves as others do.

Her lawyers argued that features of Instagram, like infinite scroll, were designed to be addictive.

Meta's growth goals were aimed at getting young people to use its platforms, Kaley's lawyers said.

Using testimony from experts and former Meta executives, they argued the company wanted young users because they were more likely to stick with its platforms for longer stretches of time.

When lawyers for Kaley told Adam Mosseri, the head of Instagram, that her longest single day of use of the platform stretched to 16 hours, he denied that it was evidence of an addiction.

Instead, he called a teenager spending most hours of the day on Instagram "problematic".

Lawyers for Kaley said Wednesday that the jury's verdict "sends an unmistakable message that no company is above accountability when it comes to our children."

Another case against Meta and other social media platforms over their alleged harms to children is poised to begin in June in California federal court.

JaesunG on March 25th, 2026 at 18:38 UTC »

at least give us the option to turn off Youtube shorts goddamnit.

pat_the_catdad on March 25th, 2026 at 17:46 UTC »

Can I get $3M?

In fact, is there a class action we can join so we can all get $3M? Including dead relatives that Meta has decided to use AI to post on their behalf?

SteamerTheBeemer on March 25th, 2026 at 17:40 UTC »

In a verdict delivered on Wednesday to Judge Carolyn Kuhl, the panel of jurors found Meta and Google intentionally built addictive social media platforms that harmed the mental health of a 20-year old woman, known as Kaley.

The jury's finding will likely influence hundreds of similar cases now winding their way through the US courts.

Lawyers for Meta argued that while Kaley had suffered in her life, her use of Instagram - which Meta owns along with Facebook and WhatsApp - did not cause or meaningfully contribute to those struggles.