The Daily Populous Tuesday February 24th, 2026 morning edition
Authored by forward.com and submitted by plz-let-me-in

Senior Democrats who worked on the party’s 2024 presidential election autopsy concluded that the Biden administration’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war was a “net negative” for Democrats and cost Vice President Kamala Harris critical support among younger and progressive voters, according to a new report published Sunday. The Democratic National Committee has so far withheld the findings from public release.

Activists affiliated with the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project, a progressive research group, told Axios that in post-election discussions with DNC representatives, party officials acknowledged that the Biden administration’s support for Israel during the war in Gaza was a factor in former Vice President Kamala Harris’ loss to Donald Trump.

The war loomed large in the campaign before Biden withdrew from the race. Anxious Democrats reportedly pressured the former president to “take a tougher stance on Israel” as one way to recover from his catastrophic debate performance in June 2024. Some advisers floated the idea of conditioning or halting certain arms transfers to shift the campaign’s direction and appeal to disaffected progressives and voters in Michigan — a swing state with a substantial Arab American community — who had cast “uncommitted” protest ballots in the primary.

Harris, who was more forceful in her call for an immediate ceasefire to address the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, lost Michigan and Pennsylvania by almost 2 points.

“We should have done more as an administration,” Harris said in November. “We should have spoken publicly about our criticism” of how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government “were executing this war.”

The DNC claimed it has shared the internal findings with party leaders and candidates. Progressive activists are pushing for them to be made public ahead of the midterm elections. Abbas Alawieh, one of the leaders of the uncommitted movement in Michigan, said the 2024 outcomes is “a lesson our party must reckon with in public.”

In her book about the election, titled 107 Days, Harris addressed what she described as the political fallout from Biden’s statements and her own stance on the war, writing that it hurt Democrats with key constituencies.

“The issue was not binary, but the outcome of this election certainly was,” Harris wrote, adding that she wished that those who protested her understood that “sitting out the election or voting for a third candidate would elect Trump and kill any effort for a just peace, any hope for a two-state solution.”

In her own defense, Harris wrote that she “wanted to acknowledge the complexity, nuance and history of the region, but it seemed very few people had the appetite for that or the willingness to hold two tragic narratives in their mind at the same time, to grieve for human suffering both Israeli and Palestinian.”

In her rushed vetting of running mates, Harris pushed Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro to apologize for criticizing pro-Palestinian campus protests, which he refused to do, according to his recent memoir.

Harris wrote that she discussed with Shapiro how his selection might affect the campaign, including the risk of protests tied to Gaza at the Democratic National Convention and “what effect it might have on the enthusiasm we were trying to build.” She wrote that Shapiro responded by saying he had clarified that earlier views he held were misguided and that he was firmly committed to a two-state solution. Harris ultimately selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate, but protests over Gaza still roiled the Democratic convention. Uncommitted delegates staged a sit-in outside the venue after the DNC declined to allow a Palestinian American to address the main stage.

Palestinian rights have increasingly become a litmus test for Democrats.

Recent national polls show Democratic voters have as a group become more sympathetic to Palestinians. The IMEU Policy Project conducted a poll after the Democratic primary for New York City mayor last year, which showed that Zohran Mamdani’s sharp criticism of Israel attracted new voters and energized parts of the Democratic electorate that contributed to his victory. The post-primary survey showed that 78% agreed with his belief that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza, and 79% supported restricting weapons to Israel.

Last August, the Democratic National Committee withdrew a resolution reaffirming the party’s support for Israel and a two-state solution to avoid a clash with younger and progressive activists who were pressing for sharper opposition to Israel.

In July, a record 27 Senate Democrats, a majority of the caucus, supported a pair of resolutions calling for the blocking of weapons transfers to Israel.

Even national Jewish Democrats, like Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel — both considered possible presidential candidates in 2028 — have publicly challenged Israeli policy. Shapiro has repeatedly been critical of Netanyahu and, last year, criticized the Israeli government’s rejection of international reports on hunger in Gaza, calling it “abhorrent” and “wrong.”

Correction: An earlier version of this article described the Democratic National Committee’s 2024 election review as “leaked.” The DNC later clarified that the findings were shared during internal consultations and were not leaked.

getridofwires on February 23rd, 2026 at 17:32 UTC »

It's terrible that this was a big drain, but I think the Dems have been out of touch with voters for much longer than just the most recent election. They are likely to get a blue wave in November because people dislike Trump, but they should not take that as vindication of their poor understanding of voter sentiment over the past decade.

Far_Eye6555 on February 23rd, 2026 at 15:53 UTC »

It’s odd to me that it was suddenly forgotten around election time how natenahyu and the Kushner’s are very close family friends.

ChaseThoseDreams on February 23rd, 2026 at 15:32 UTC »

There are two truths at play here: 1) not voting for Harris was more harmful to Palestine, as Trump was exceedingly the bigger threat to them, and 2) the DNC committed malpractice by not listening to their voters and expecting their votes simply by virtue of not being Trump.

As easy as it is to bag on voters who didn’t show up, at some point you have to hold the DNC accountable. If Trump was really the catastrophic threat to our democracy like they ran on, which he is, why didn’t the DNC course correct? Why was their pitch to the American people the status quo which was not polling well? It screams entitlement and incompetence. We should have much higher expectations of those wanting to be voted in and to lead than our voters.