The Daily Populous Wednesday January 28th, 2026 night edition
Authored by uk.news.yahoo.com and submitted by yahoonews

The United States could alter its decades-old North American Aerospace Defense Command deal with Canada should its government backtrack on the purchase of 88 Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jets, the U.S. ambassador to Canada has warned.

In the latest back-and-forth between the U.S. and Canada over the deal, Ambassador Pete Hoekstra cautioned that if Canada purchased fewer fighter jets, the U.S. would “fill those gaps” in security concerns.

That could mean the U.S. would need to purchase more F-35 fighter jets for its own use and use them to intervene in Canadian airspace more frequently.

Under the current terms of NORAD, the U.S. and Canada can operate in one another’s airspace to track or intercept threats. However, Hoekstra indicated U.S. intervention would go even further, should the fighter jet deal change, thus requiring new terms to the Cold War-era agreement.

“NORAD would have to be altered,” Hoekstra told CBC News.

Hoekstra’s comments come months after the Canadian government indicated it was “reviewing” the terms of the fighter jet deal after finding the program to be costlier than expected.

Under the terms of NORAD, the US and Canada can fly in one another’s airspace to intercept threats (AFP/Getty)

In 2022, Canada agreed to purchase 88 F-35A advanced fighter jets from Lockheed Martin, with the country initially committing to funding 16 deliverable jets.

But quickly, the program ran into challenges. Not only has it taken longer than anticipated to manufacture the jets, but a 2025 initial audit of the deal found that the program had risen to $27.7 billion in cost – up from its initial $19 billion.

With tensions between the U.S. and Canada increasing due to President Donald Trump’s tariff threats, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney called for the review.

Now, Canadian officials are reportedly looking to other countries to supply it with fighter jets, including Saab, the Swedish aerospace and defense company that creates the JAS 39 Gripen E fighter. Saab has offered to manufacture the jets in Canada, creating 12,600 jobs.

“The government is interested in all major projects that can not only protect Canada's security and sovereignty, but also create jobs across the country,” Mélanie Joly, the Minister of Industry, told CBC News.

“We certainly can’t control President Trump, but … we can control our defense investments, who we award contracts to and how we are ultimately able to create jobs in Canada. So we’re going to focus on that.”

Hoekstra (left of Trump) described the US’s current defense relationship with Canada as ‘awesome’ (Getty)

But Hoekstra warned that if Canada chooses to purchase Saab’s Gripen E jets, the U.S. would still need to reconsider how it works with its northern neighbor on security.

“If they decide they’re going with an inferior product that is not as interchangeable, interoperable as what the F-35 is, that changes our defense capability,” Hoekstra said.

“And as such, we have to figure out how we’re going to replace that,” the ambassador added.

Hoekstra’s warning is the latest attempt by a U.S. official to pressure another country to comply with the administration’s desires, specifically those related to national security. It comes on the heels of Trump threatening to impose tariffs on European allies for not supporting a U.S. deal to acquire Greenland.

Zombie_John_Strachan on January 27th, 2026 at 12:37 UTC »

We have already committed to buy 16 F35s. The context here is that Saab is trying hard to get us to cancel our second order of ~70 F-35s and switch to Gripen fighters.

The US Ambassador to Canada is a Trump stooge who has spent the last year threatening us over basically everything. He’s saying if we don’t buy their planes the US will invade our airspace whether we like it or not.

We currently patrol the north with CF-18s. Both the F35 and Gripen are huge upgrades. Both can satisfy our NORAD commitments. The RCAF prefers the F35 but Canadians have zero patience for US bullshit right now.

Canada is not abandoning our fighter jet or northern patrol capabilities. This is purely a shakedown by Hoekstra to protect a US manufacturer.

Altaccount330 on January 27th, 2026 at 11:01 UTC »

We’re already in NORAD. Armed US fighter jets already patrol Canadian airspace. The command structure makes them responsive to the Prime Minister in certain situations.

GiantEnemaCrab on January 27th, 2026 at 10:52 UTC »

Yahoo news citing The Independent has to be the least credible source I have ever seen.

The article just says if Canada doesn't buy the jets the US will use its own forces so there isn't a fighter coverage gap. The US and Canada already share their airspaces. This isn't news. That's literally the purpose of NORAD. The article title purposefully makes it sound like the US would be attacking. Come on.