The Daily Populous Thursday January 22nd, 2026 day edition
Authored by pbs.org and submitted by Human-Entrepreneur77

President Trump announced what he called the framework of a deal over Greenland, the Danish island he had threatened to take over. There are not many details, but Trump said it would allow the U.S. to build missile defense bases and mine for minerals. Even as the president has taken an off-ramp, many Europeans and Canadians say the damage has already been done. Nick Schifrin reports.

Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors.

Tonight, President Trump announced what he called the framework of a deal over Greenland, the Danish island that until today he threatened to take over, if needed, by military force.

There are not a lot of details at the moment, but the president said it would allow the U.S. to build missile defense bases and mine for minerals under Greenland's ice.

But even though President Trump has taken an off-ramp, many Europeans and Canadians say the damage has already been done to the U.S. relationship with its most trusted allies.

In Davos today, after a week of threats against the U.S.' closest allies, a week in which he tied a possible takeover of NATO territory to not winning the Nobel Peace Prize, President Trump walked back from the precipice.

We have a concept of a deal. I think it's going to be a very good deal for the United States, also for them.

A deal for Greenland, the world's largest island which has been part of the kingdom of Denmark since 1721. President Trump said he would no longer tariff European allies over Greenland and the deal would allow the U.S. to expand its military presence on Greenland for a new missile defense network.

The Golden Dome -- they're going to be involved in the Golden Dome, and they're going to be involved in mineral rights. And so are we.

Is -- you can't -- it's not specific enough to know at this point how long this lasts, how -- whether it's...

So you can be assured, absolutely, if ever the U.S. will be under attack, your allies will be with you.

The announcement came after President Trump met NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. And a NATO official says the deal will boost NATO presence around Greenland and the Arctic and block Russian and Chinese military and economic access to Greenland.

Earlier today, President Trump for the first time took the military option off the table.

People thought I would use force. I don't have to use force. I don't want to use force. I won't use force.

But he once again saved his greatest grievances for America's greatest allies.

The United States is treated very unfairly by NATO. We have helped them for so many years. We have never gotten anything. It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it and improve it.

Never mind that Greenland and Denmark insist the island is not for sale.

For the first time binds this country to a military agreement during days of peace.

And never mind that, for 77 years, the United States has anchored NATO's promise of collective defense for all members' territory.

And all we're asking for is to get Greenland, including right, title and ownership, because you need the ownership to defend it. You can't defend it on a lease.

Greenland sits in the middle of the shortest route between the U.S. and Russia, and, for decades, it hosted multiple U.S. air defense bases. But after the Cold War, the U.S. closed all but one, which today is the U.S.' northernmost base.

Greenland is sitting undefended in a key strategic location between the United States, Russia, and China.

European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen:

The threat of additional tariffs for security reasons is simply wrong.

But Trump's threats have deeply damaged transatlantic trust, leading European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen today to argue the U.S. is shooting itself in the foot.

If we are now plunging into a dangerous downward spiral between allies, this would only embolden the very adversaries we are both so committed to keeping out of the strategic landscape.

And, yesterday, of all countries, Canada suggested a new world order in which relatively smaller countries resist the superpowers, even neighbors.

Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition. The middle powers must act together, because, if we're not at the table, we're on the menu. We shouldn't allow the rise of hard power to blind us to the fact that the power of legitimacy, integrity, and rules will remain strong if we choose to wield them together.

So even if there is a Greenland deal, this week perhaps finally proved that Trump's art of the deal and pressure tactics threaten the U.S.' oldest alliances.

For the "PBS News Hour," I'm Nick Schifrin.

schprunt on January 22nd, 2026 at 07:40 UTC »

He’s already earned millions on the stock market from this. It’s a huge grift

Human-Entrepreneur77 on January 22nd, 2026 at 07:20 UTC »

We found out what pulls Trumps strings. It's not failing farms or bankrupt businesses. Nor sick Americans with sky-high health insurance. It's not our allies who stood with us against the USSR and terrorism, it's the stock market.

Cosmos1985 on January 22nd, 2026 at 07:17 UTC »

Danish PM Mette Frederiksen:

> Security in the Arctic is a matter of concern for the entire NATO alliance. It is therefore both good and natural that it is also discussed between NATO’s Secretary General and the President of the United States. The Kingdom of Denmark has for a long time worked to ensure that NATO increases its engagement in the Arctic.

> Throughout the entire process, the Danish government has coordinated our efforts with the Government of Greenland, Naalakkersuisut. We have been in close dialogue with NATO, and I myself have spoken continuously with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, including both before and after his meeting with President Trump in Davos.

> NATO is fully aware of the Kingdom of Denmark’s position. We can negotiate about everything political — security, investments, the economy. But we cannot negotiate about our sovereignty.

> I have been informed that this has not been the case either. And of course, it is only Denmark and Greenland themselves who can make decisions in matters concerning Denmark and Greenland.

> The Kingdom of Denmark continues to seek a constructive dialogue with allies on how we can strengthen security in the Arctic, including the United States’ Golden Dome, provided that this takes place with respect for our territorial integrity.

https://nyheder.tv2.dk/live/2025-01-06-kampen-om-groenlands-fremtid?entry=59b18c6e-b88a-4411-b99e-00e63aec9c68