The Daily Populous Tuesday December 16th, 2025 evening edition
Authored by the-independent.com and submitted by Disastrous_Award_789

The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice

A lawyer and her golden retriever are suing the Internal Revenue Service to try and get pets classified as legal dependents – a change that would have some tax benefits for pet owners.

Canine Finnegan Mary Reynolds and her owner, attorney Amanda Reynolds, filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of New York, arguing that the pooch relies entirely on Reynolds for food, shelter, medical care, training, transportation and more, Forbes reported.

Reynolds argued that Finnegan, an eight-year-old golden retriever, has no independent income, resides exclusively with her and has annual expenses exceeding $5,000 – all requirements for a legal human dependent under IRS rules.

While the IRS defines pets as property, Reynolds says this does not reflect Finnegan’s role in their household, according to QZ.

“For all intents and purposes, Finnegan is like my daughter, and is definitely a ‘dependent,’” the case reads, noting that while the subject may seem unusual, it is “not frivolous or meritless.”

open image in gallery Since dogs rely on their owners for everything from food to medical care, one owner has argued that the IRS needs to change their legal standings. ( AFP via Getty Images )

Reynolds goes on to argue that not classifying all pets as dependents is an unfair burden to taxpayers, especially since the IRS says that some pets – namely, service animals – can qualify for tax advantages.

Claiming a dependent can result in tax-favored credits and deductions, according to Forbes. This includes Child Tax Credit (and Additional Child Tax Credit), the Credit for Other Dependents, and the Earned Income Tax Credit, the outlet reports.

There isn’t, however, “any language in case law or statutes that would allow pet owners to claim those tax breaks,” Forbes reports.

While pets have a special place in many households across the country, as seen by a recent study that found “an increasing number of owners have begun to regard their dogs as their children,” the case seems unlikely to move forward.

Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks, who is overseeing the case, has granted a motion to pause the discovery process as the IRS will likely file a motion to dismiss the case.

ToOpineIsFine on December 16th, 2025 at 13:48 UTC »

People seem to have forgotten what taxes are for. People get deductions for dependents, since the dependent will eventually contribute to society in general - not just to the owner. This lawyer needs to go back to school.

geodebug on December 16th, 2025 at 13:05 UTC »

Nope. Because people are people I can just imagine the animal abuse as people start hoarding pets for the deductions.

Edit: as someone pointed out this would probably be more abusable if this was implemented as a credit (like the Child Tax Credit).

UberCOTA55 on December 16th, 2025 at 12:57 UTC »

As much as I have paid in vet bills when my doggo had cancer, I kinda agree. Animal upkeep can be expensive and if a yacht can be a tax deduction, why not my dog?