Swiss voters on Sunday decisively rejected a call to require women to do national service in the military, civil protection teams or other forms, as all men must do already.
Official results, with counting still ongoing in some areas after a referendum, showed that more than half of Switzerland’s cantons, or states, had rejected the “citizen service initiative” by wide margins. That meant it was defeated, because proposals need a majority of both voters and cantons to pass.
Voters also heavily rejected a separate proposal to impose a new national tax on individual donations or inheritances of more than 50 million francs ($62 million), with the revenues to be used to fight the impact of climate change and help Switzerland meet its ambitions to have net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Supporters of the national service plan hoped that it would boost social cohesion by adding jobs in areas like environmental prevention, food security and elderly care.
But lawmakers opposed it, mainly for cost reasons and out of concern that it could hurt the economy by taking many young people out of the workforce.
The national service proposal came at a time when other European countries are finding ways to bolster their armed forces in the face of growing concerns about Russia’s potential threat beyond the war in Ukraine.
Young men in neutral Switzerland are already required to carry out military service or join civil protection teams. Conscientious objectors can do other types of service, and those who opt out entirely must pay an exemption fee. Each year, about 35,000 men take part in mandatory service.
The failed initiative would have required all Swiss citizens to do national service — women can currently do so on a voluntary basis — and applied the concept of national security to areas beyond military service or civil protection.
Its supporters pointed to “landslides in the mountains, floods in the plains, cyberattacks, risks of energy shortages or war in Europe” and said that their plan would mean everyone taking responsibility for “a stronger Switzerland that’s able to stand up to crises.”
The government countered that the army and civil defense have enough staff, and no more people should be recruited than are needed.
While compulsory military service for women might be seen as “a step toward gender equality,” it added, the idea would “place an extra burden on many women, who already shoulder a large part of the unpaid work of raising and caring for children and relatives, as well as household tasks.”
The government also opposed the proposal for a new tax on large donations or inheritances, arguing that approval could prod some of the wealthiest in Switzerland — an estimated 2,500 people — to move elsewhere. Sums beyond 50 million francs ($62 million) could have been hit with a 50% rate.
Switzerland holds national referendums four times a year, giving voters a direct say in policymaking.
Xenon009 on November 30th, 2025 at 19:42 UTC »
A lot of people are asking why any group should be conscripted, and as a website that is predominantly anglosphere nations, its easy for us to say. The US, UK, Canda, Australia and New Zealand all have the benefit of huge amounts of water protecting us from anyone who would do us harm.
As islands (or defacto islands in the case of north america) we have the luxury of only needing armies large enough to defend a few landing sites, not an entire front.
Continental nations do not have that luxury. Even shitshows of military actions, like the russian invasion of ukraine took a huge amount of territory in a week, more than the entire territory of Switzerland.
In the case of a more competent attack, like that of desert storm, that we might expect from a proper military, most european nations would fold rapidly if caught unprepared.
In that regard, there isn't time to pass mobilisation laws and train rookies for a few months, troops are needed IMMEDIATELY, and that is the purpose of conscription.
I don't know why Switzerland thinks it needs conscription at this point, but for nations in eastern europe, the baltics and the scandis, it is unfortunately necessary.
skeleton949 on November 30th, 2025 at 18:21 UTC »
Then they should just abolish mandatory national service as a whole then, right?
TheBatemanFlex on November 30th, 2025 at 15:53 UTC »
I mean they are 51% female. Why would they vote against their own interest?