GOP will ‘battle it out in primaries’: Experts weigh in on future of the Republican party 09:11
MAGA fault lines: White House pursues ‘course corrections’ amid dismal polling & party pushback 11:09
‘Misguided from the beginning’: California Republican slams Johnson over redistricting wars 09:54
Analysts push back on GOP’s ‘double standard remedy’ as measure allows Senate to sue DOJ 05:28
‘This is un-American’: Durham official slams Trump as immigration crackdown terrifies North Carolina 07:43
We will know if the DOJ is playing games’: House Oversight Dem details next moves on Epstein files 10:02
Former Trump lawyer: ‘The Constitution is not adequate to deal with a president as evil as Trump’ 11:22
‘Sad to see the retaliation’: Rep. Khanna slams Trump for targeting MTG over Epstein files release 08:05
The threats ‘were immediate’: Dem lawmaker speaks out after being threatened for video to US troops 09:40
jelasher on November 24th, 2025 at 03:05 UTC »
The Constitution is perfectly well designed to handle a corrupt president—but the framers didn’t imagine that Congress would be complicit. The problem is that our system cannot handle a corrupt party.
verifiedboomer on November 24th, 2025 at 02:53 UTC »
The framers of the constitution never imagined the people would elect a president so manifestly unsuited to the job. Maybe the framers imagined that voters would generally be educated and well informed and incapable of being so badly hoodwinked.
If I had a time machine, I would go back and show them a few hours of Fox News.
ManiaGamine on November 24th, 2025 at 02:38 UTC »
The Constitution isn't the problem, the lack of enforcement of said Constitution is. A law isn't bad because it isn't being properly enforced.
No alteration to the Constitution to "strengthen" it would likely work here because the problem isn't the document, it's the people charged with upholding it.