The Daily Populous Thursday September 25th, 2025 day edition
Authored by aol.com and submitted by AOL

Hershey received a treat Friday when a judge dismissed a lawsuit claiming the company's Reese's candies tricked customers by depicting spooky Halloween designs on their packaging, while the unwrapped chocolates were in fact featureless.

U.S. District Judge Melissa Damian ruled Friday that the consumers who filed the class-action lawsuit failed to show that the lack of confectionary details on the chocolate and peanut butter candies, such as missing mouths and eyes on jack-'o-lanterns, ghosts and other Halloween-themed figures, had cause them economic harm.

Damian pointed out that while the consumers may have been disappointed by the chocolates' unwrapped appearances, the candies were not "so flawed as to render them worthless." In other words, the chocolate still tasted like chocolate, even if they weren't as haunting as the purchasers had expected from the packaging.

A 2024 lawsuit alleged Hershey had engaged in deceptive advertising by depicting chocolate pumpkins with carved faces, when the unwrapped chocolates were blank. A judge dismissed the lawsuit on Sept. 19. / Credit: U.S. District Court of Southern Florida

The lawsuit focused on several Hershey candies that are marketed around Halloween, including its Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins and its Reese's White Ghost, as well as a few other holiday-themed chocolates like its Reese's Peanut Butter Shapes Assortment Snowmen Stockings Bells.

The original lawsuit, filed in 2024, claimed that Hershey used deceptive advertising because the "artistic designs" depicted on the wrappers were absent from the actual candies.

A photo of an unwrapped Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkin included in a 2024 lawsuit alleging deceptive advertising over the difference between the wrapper and the appearance of the actual candy. / Credit: U.S. District Court of Southern Florida

But the difference between the wrappers and the chocolates' actual appearances wasn't enough to prove "a concrete economic injury," Damian wrote on Friday.

"Plaintiffs' conclusory allegations as to why they have allegedly been deprived of the benefit of their bargain all boil down to their subjective, personal expectations of how the products would or should have looked when unpackaged," the judge added.

Anthony Russo, an attorney for the consumers who sued Hershey, said that they intend to amend the complaint.

"The court is merely saying that the plaintiffs did not expressly allege in the complaint that the products were worthless to them or that they paid a price premium and allowed plaintiffs to amend the complaint, which they will be doing," Russo told CBS News.

He added, "We believe that companies should not be awarded with sales when they falsely represent the main characteristic of the product and only have to pay damages if it can be shown that the consumers paid a premium."

Hershey didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump slams Jimmy Kimmel's return to late-night TV on ABC

Trump blasts U.N. during General Assembly address

Comedian on Jimmy Kimmel's return: "An issue like free speech brings out strange bedfellows"

TheLemon22 on September 24th, 2025 at 23:19 UTC »

They actually have extremely strict laws about this exact thing in Japan. Not only does the artwork on the food wrapper need to be accurate, there MUST be a depiction of the food inside on the packaging no matter what, period. It's also the easiest way to tell in Japan whether or not the juice you're about to drink is 100% juice - it has to have a realistic photo of the real fruit on the label if it is.

Buckwheat469 on September 24th, 2025 at 22:50 UTC »

I get the intent of the lawsuit. If a company represents their product a certain way then the customer should expect to see it that way. There's an obvious limit though, like faces cut into the chocolate, but a lawsuit like this can prevent another company from misrepresenting their product.

The problem is that nobody cares. We have products being sold on Amazon that are clearly misrepresented, and nobody is stopping that. There's no government agency to prevent any of this, and lawsuits don't cost the company anything. The good intentions of this lawsuit are moot.

eyesmart1776 on September 24th, 2025 at 21:02 UTC »

It says consumers didn’t pay a premium but aren’t these seasonal versions more expensive than the standard ?