The Daily Populous Thursday May 15th, 2025 evening edition
Authored by thedailybeast.com and submitted by Exciting_Teacher6258

A Milwaukee judge who was arrested for allegedly shielding an undocumented immigrant from ICE arrest has argued that she can’t be prosecuted based on the same case that granted President Donald Trump broad immunity for “official” acts.

The FBI arrested Hannah Dugan last month after she allegedly told agents with Immigration and Customs Enforcement that they needed a warrant to arrest an undocumented immigrant who had appeared in her courtroom on a misdemeanor charge.

FBI Director Kash Patel accused Dugan in a social media post of “intentionally misdirecting federal agents away” from the man, a Mexican immigrant named Eduardo Flores Ruiz, who was nevertheless arrested outside the courthouse.

Dugan was indicted on Tuesday for allegedly concealing a person from arrest and obstruction. A day later, her lawyers argued in a motion to dismiss the case that Dugan is “no ordinary criminal defendant.”

Judge Hannah Dugan has become a new resistance hero. Mike De Sisti/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel/USA TODAY NETWORK/Imagn

The motion argued that the problems with the prosecution were “legion,” including the fact that they allegedly violated the U.S. Constitution’s fundamental principle of federalism. But “most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts,” it said.

As evidence, the motion cited the 2024 Supreme Court case Trump v. United States in which the court ruled the president had absolute immunity for “official acts.”

The 6-3 ruling involved Trump’s criminal prosecution over his attempts to overturn former President Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory.

It didn’t provide a standard for what counts as an “official act” or determine whether any of Trump’s individual actions fell within that category, saying only that the lower courts needed to consider the case in light of the sweeping immunity afforded to the president.

FBI Director Kash Patel accused Judge Hannah Dugan of “intentionally misdirecting federal agents away" from an undocumented immigrant who appeared in her courthouse. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Dugan’s motion argued that the same standard should apply not just to the president, but to judges as well.

“Immunity is not a defense to the prosecution to be determined later by a jury or court; it is an absolute bar to the prosecution at the outset,” the motion said.

The motion denied that Dugan had directed the defendant to leave through the jury door so he could evade ICE agents, but even if she had, “Judges are empowered to maintain control over their courtrooms specifically and the courthouse generally,” according to the motion.

Protesters demonstrate outside the Milwaukee courthouse after Judge Hannah Dugan’s arrest on April 25. Scott Olson/Getty Images

It also cited other evidence showing that judges have enjoyed immunity for official acts dating back to the 17th century in England, and carrying on through U.S. common law.

Dugan appeared briefly in court in Milwaukee on Thursday and pleaded not guilty to the charges, according to the AP. Dozens of demonstrators gathered outside the courthouse with signs that read “Only Fascists Arrest Judges—Drop the Charges” and “Department of Justice Over-Reach.”

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has temporarily removed her from the bench while the case against her is in progress, The New York Times reported.

Earlier this month, more than 150 former state and federal judges signed a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi saying Dugan’s arrest was an attempt to “intimidate and threaten the judiciary,” and a “cynical effort” that undermined the rule of law.

MAGA diehards, meanwhile, have said they hope the judge’s arrest is just the first of many.

Ok-Breadfruit6978 on May 15th, 2025 at 13:18 UTC »

This may be a tactic to get trump vs United States back in front of the supreme court so they have the opportunity to change their ruling. I hope this is really just a big brain play made by judge Dugan. But even if it’s not, I love that she is using their own rulings against them.

sniffstink1 on May 15th, 2025 at 12:26 UTC »

"Oh wait, shit...no. Wasn't supposed to be used as legal precedent (facepalm)!"

SCOTUS

Exciting_Teacher6258 on May 15th, 2025 at 11:06 UTC »

If this is allowed to stand and the judge is actually sent to prison, that is the end of democracy as we know it.