Van Hollen: If You Won’t Fight for the Constitution, You Don’t Deserve to Lead

Authored by rollingstone.com and submitted by rollingstone
image for Van Hollen: If You Won’t Fight for the Constitution, You Don’t Deserve to Lead

Sen. Chris Van Hollen defended the Constitution and fired back at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a fellow Democrat, who said that the wrongful deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident, to El Salvador was “the distraction of the day.”

“I don’t think it’s ever wrong to fight for the constitutional rights of one person because if we give up on one person’s rights, we threaten everybody’s rights. I think a lot of voters, both Republican and Democrat, are tired of elected officials and politicians who just put their finger to the wind… Anyone who is not prepared to stand up and fight for the Constitution doesn’t deserve to lead,” Van Hollen said in a Sunday interview on CNN’s State of the Union.

Sen. Van Hollen: "I don't think it's ever wrong to fight for the constitutional rights of one person because if we give up on one person's rights, we threaten everybody's rights…Anyone who is not prepared to stand up and fight for the Constitution doesn't deserve to lead." pic.twitter.com/Uv8Yk8c702 — The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) April 20, 2025

The senator last week traveled to El Salvador and its infamous Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) — one of the harshest prisons in the world — to speak with Abrego Garcia, his constituent, whom the Trump administration has admitted should not have been deported. The administration has admitted multiple times in court that Abrego Garcia’s detention was an “administrative error.”

Rep. Jason Crow also condemned the administration’s actions and disagreed with Newsom’s claim the issue is a “distraction.”

“I wouldn’t use the word distraction because this is a real man with a family. He matters,” Crow said on CNN’s Inside Politics. “There was no due process in this case… The Trump administration has no evidence that this person is a criminal, that he’s involved in any gang activity… They are trying to distort the truth. Their philosophy is to lie over and over and over again until it becomes true. That is right out of an autocratic playbook. That’s what makes this so dangerous.”

Q: Is Gavin Newsom right that the Abrego Garcia case is a 'distraction'?

Crow: "I wouldn't use the word distraction…There was no due process in this case…The Trump administration has no evidence that this person is a criminal…That is right out of an autocratic playbook." pic.twitter.com/8R7qqCqHS2 — The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) April 20, 2025

While El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele initially denied Van Hollen’s attempts to speak with Abrego Garcia, he ultimately caved, and allowed Van Hollen to meet his constituent. Editor’s picks

“What [Abrego Garcia] told me was he was sad and traumatized that he was being imprisoned because he has committed no crimes,” Van Hollen said.

Van Hollen demanded the Trump administration must “put up or shut up in court” regarding Abrego Garcia’s case. The administration is currently defying a court order — upheld in a unanimous Supreme Court ruling — to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return to the U.S. A lower court has also rejected the administration’s attempt not to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling. Abrego Garcia has not been convicted of a crime or proven in court to be a member of any gang. Despite that, the administration continues to claim he is a member of MS-13.

“The subject at hand is that he and his administration are defying a court order to give people, to give Abrego Garcia his due process rights,” Van Hollen said. “They are trying to litigate on social media what they should be doing in the courts.”

He went on to quote U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who said, “No evidence linking Abrego Garcia to MS-13 or any terrorist activity has been presented to the court.”

“He’s here legally now, he has a work permit, he’s a sheet metal worker, he has a family, he has three kids,” Van Hollen said.

Van Hollen was denied entry to CECOT and initially was not allowed to see Abrego Garcia. Bukele and Trump “had no intention of letting me meet with Abrego Garcia until they felt the pressure” from public outcry the senator said. Following Van Hollen’s visit, Abrego Garcia was moved to a different detention facility where “conditions are better,” the senator said Friday. Related Content

Van Hollen also gave a peek behind the scenes of his meeting with Abrego Garcia, saying that the Salvadoran government staged the scene to look like the two of them were drinking margaritas.

“The lengths that both the El Salvadorian President Bukele and Donald Trump will go to deceive people are boundless,” he said, adding that waiters brought to the table two glasses that “appear to be margaritas.”

“We didn’t touch them, and they tried to manipulate it to make it look like Mr. Abrego Garcia’s margarita had been drunk. In other words, the liquid was lower,” he continued. “But they screwed up in their scheme because if you look at the rims of the glasses, I don’t know if it was salt or sugar, but there’s no gap in them. So, nobody touched the margaritas.”

“They want to pretend that this is some sort of tropical paradise when he was in one of the most notorious prisons in the world,” the senator added.

Van Hollen stressed the urgency of the issue of Abrego Garcia’s deportation and the necessity of defending his constitutional rights to protect those same rights for everyone in the U.S.

“Right now, we have a lawless president… who is ignoring the order of the Supreme Court of the United States to facilitate [Abrego Garcia’s] return,” Van Hollen said. “That’s what’s going on right now. That is a risk to all of us.” Trending Stories Trump's 'Happy Easter' Message Filled With Vengeance and Vitriol First Corporate-Sponsored White House Easter Egg Roll Draws Trump Pals Amazon, Google, Meta 'F-ck You': Nancy Mace Loses It in Public Argument With Constituent Being Trans in Country Is Dangerous. It Didn’t Stop This Singer From Coming Out

Politico’s Jonathan Martin made the point on ABC’s This Week that Abrego Garcia’s deportation is a “test case” for Trump to send Americans to foreign prisons.

Abrego Garcia’s deportation was a “test case” for Pres. Trump to remove Americans from the U.S., Politico’s @jmart said.

“It’s what Trump wants to do, which is deport American citizens who commit crimes to foreign prisons.” https://t.co/EiB1FVE0fE pic.twitter.com/XABVcc0RDF — This Week (@ThisWeekABC) April 20, 2025

“It’s what Trump wants to do, which is deport American citizens who commit crimes to foreign prisons,” Martin said. “He’s said it himself twice now. That’s where this is going. This is a test case for Trump to get Americans out of the country.”

bailaoban on April 20th, 2025 at 16:48 UTC »

That’s why Lisa Murkowski’s statement about everyone being too afraid to oppose Trump, while maybe honest, is infuriating. There is no greater responsibility as a member Congress than to oppose unconstitutionality, and if you’re too afraid to lose power, you don’t deserve it.

rollingstone on April 20th, 2025 at 16:18 UTC »

From Rolling Stone’s Peter Wade:

Sen. Chris Van Hollen defended the Constitution and fired back at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a fellow Democrat, who said that the wrongful deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident, to El Salvador was “the distraction of the day.”

“I don’t think it’s ever wrong to fight for the constitutional rights of one person because if we give up on one person’s rights, we threaten everybody’s rights. I think a lot of voters, both Republican and Democrat, are tired of elected officials and politicians who just put their finger to the wind… Anyone who is not prepared to stand up and fight for the Constitution doesn’t deserve to lead,” Van Hollen said in a Sunday interview on CNN’s State of the Union.

Read and watch more: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/van-hollen-abrego-garcia-newsom-1235321534/

Mindless_Listen7622 on April 20th, 2025 at 16:14 UTC »

Given the oath that Congress takes, if you won't fight for the Constitution you don't deserve to be in Congress.