President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said that NATO membership is still one of the most critical security guarantees for Ukraine. He argues that an 800,000-strong Ukrainian military would be a bonus to the Alliance, particularly if US President Donald Trump pursues a policy of withdrawing American troops from overseas deployments.
Source: Zelenskyy in an interview with Associated Press
Details: Zelenskyy stressed that any deal struck with Russia would only be a precondition for future aggression without security guarantees from Ukraine's allies. NATO membership is still Kyiv's main choice.
The Ukrainian president believes that NATO membership is the "cheapest" option for Ukraine's allies and it would also strengthen Trump geopolitically.
Quote from Zelenskyy: "I really believe that these are the cheapest security guarantees that Ukraine can get, the cheapest for everyone...
It will be a signal that it is not for Russia to decide who should be in NATO and who should not, but for the United States of America to decide. I think this is a great victory for Trump."
Details: Zelenskyy also noted that an 800,000-strong Ukrainian military would be a bonus for the Alliance, especially if Trump seeks to bring home American troops stationed abroad.
He added that other security guarantee proposals should be reinforced by adequate weapon supplies from the US and Europe and support for Kyiv in strengthening its own defence industry.
Zelenskyy also stated that the French proposal to deploy European forces in Ukraine to deter Russian aggression is taking shape. However, he noted that many questions remain regarding the command and control structure, the number of troops and their deployment locations.
He said this issue was raised with French President Emmanuel Macron and Trump: "I said in the presence of the two leaders that we are interested in this as a part of the security guarantee, but not as the only guarantee of safety. That’s not enough."
Quote from Zelenskyy: "Imagine, there is a contingent. The question is who is in charge? Who is the main one? What will they do if there are Russian strikes? Missiles, disembarkation, attack from the sea, crossing of the land borderline, offensive. What will they do? What are their mandates?"
When asked if he had asked these questions directly to Macron, Zelenskyy replied: "We are still in the process of this dialogue".
Support UP or become our patron!
cjp2010 on February 2nd, 2025 at 12:47 UTC »
Sometimes I think it would be easier for countries to just not be assholes and then we wouldn’t need to have military alliances. Imagine how advanced our society could be if we stopped trying to kill each other and worked towards other more productive goals.
MotherMilks99 on February 2nd, 2025 at 12:26 UTC »
Well, 800,000 soldiers is definitely one way to make your NATO membership application stand out.
IVIilitarus on February 2nd, 2025 at 12:14 UTC »
It's an army of decade-veterans who've fought Russians and Soviet-style equipment across multiple high-intensity conflicts. They're pioneers in multiple new forms of future combat: UAV recon, drone carriers, one-way attack drones at the tactical and strategic scales, naval drones. They're godamned experts at using coordinating disparate equipment from like forty countries and running a supply chain to make it all work.
Ukraine's armed forces are quite possibly the best in the world at many things. I don't think anyone can deny how much of an asset they'd be in any defensive alliance. Everyone with a brain cell would beg to have a force like Ukraine on their side.
Except as for as long as ratfuckers like Orban and Putin are around, their chances of getting into the alliance are buried lower than the Moskva.