The Daily Populous Monday November 4th, 2024 night edition
Authored by theguardian.com and submitted by dumb_wiseman96

Elon Musk’s troubled canvassing operation on behalf of Donald Trump and the Republican party is now facing a lawsuit in southern California filed by two women who say they were cheated out of wages and expenses as they knocked on doors for an embattled Republican congresswoman.

The suit accuses Musk’s America Pac, which has poured more than $100m into this year’s election campaign, of “willful violations of the California labor code” by paying the plaintiffs less than it promised and refusing to make up the difference.

The women, Tamiko Anderson and Patricia Kelly, say they were hired last month and promised an hourly wage – about $25, according to their lead lawyer – to help turn out votes for Michelle Steel, who represents a closely contested swing district in Orange county, south of Los Angeles.

It was only once the women started working, the suit alleges, that they found out they were being paid instead by the number of houses they visited. The suit further alleges that they were not reimbursed for work-related expenses, including the use of personal cellphones to track their movements along their designated routes.

Musk’s ground-game operation has come under repeated scrutiny in recent days following a report in the Guardian that canvassers may have skipped as many as a quarter of the houses they claimed to have visited in Arizona and Nevada, and a second report in Wired that revealed hired canvassers in Michigan were not told which campaign they were working for until they had already signed on.

The Orange county lawsuit, also first reported by Wired, did not specify how much less the women had earned than they were expecting, or how much they had unsuccessfully claimed in expenses. The lead plaintiff’s lawyer, Larry Lee, said that they did not have a signed contract for their work, only a “sheet of paper” detailing the hourly wage they should expect.

These, however, were not reasons to consider the suit some kind of political stunt days before the 5 November election, according to a prominent national labor lawyer, Ryan Hancock of Willig, Williams & Davidson in Philadelphia. He said it was common for such suits to be light on details when first filed, and amended and fleshed out later. “This appears to be a legitimate lawsuit based on an employer failing to pay compensation owed under state and federal law,” Hancock said.

Musk’s Pac is one of several named defendants in the suit, along with a hiring and payroll company, Liberty Staffing Services; a national canvassing company, the Blair Group; and Representative Michelle Steel’s re-election campaign.

skip past newsletter promotion Sign up to Headlines US Free newsletter Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning Enter your email address Sign up Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy . We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. after newsletter promotion

The campaign, however, was quick to disavow any association with the canvassing operation. “The Steel campaign has no knowledge of these individuals,” a spokesperson said. “They did not and do not work for the Steel campaign.”

Pac like Musk’s usually operate independently of candidates’ campaigns, under rules that make it illegal to coordinate activities. When asked why he had named Steel’s campaign among the defendants, Lee, the plaintiff’s lawyer, said: “I’m not going to comment.”

reddurkel on November 3rd, 2024 at 12:51 UTC »

This must be one of those criminal immigrants that I keep hearing about.

derpdankstrom on November 3rd, 2024 at 12:49 UTC »

> “willful violations of the California labor code” by paying the plaintiffs less than it promised and refusing to make up the difference.

not only is he grifting his consumers NOW he is grifting his employees

Traditional_Key_763 on November 3rd, 2024 at 12:44 UTC »

of course they likely are. they're also likely breaking DOT rules for transportation of workers in vehicles not equipped for passengers