The Daily Populous Saturday October 26th, 2024 night edition
Authored by cnbc.com and submitted by Careful-Rent5779

"It represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love, and for which we have worked a combined 218 years," the column said. "This is a moment for the institution to be making clear its commitment to democratic values, the rule of law and international alliances, and the threat that Donald Trump poses to them — the precise points The Post made in endorsing Trump's opponents in 2016 and 2020."

The Post on Friday evening published a third article, signed by opinion columnists for the newspaper, who said, "The Washington Post's decision not to make an endorsement in the presidential campaign is a terrible mistake."

In a statement to CNBC, when asked about Bezos' purported role in killing the endorsement, Post chief communications officer Kathy Baird said, "This was a Washington Post decision to not endorse, and I would refer you to the publisher's statement in full."

The Post since 1976 had regularly endorsed candidates for president, except for the 1988 race. All those endorsements had been for Democrats.

In a 2019 lawsuit, Amazon claimed it had lost a $10 billion cloud computing contract with the Pentagon to Microsoft because Trump had used "improper pressure ... to harm his perceived political enemy" Bezos.

The newspaper in 2016 and again in 2020 endorsed Trump's election opponents, Hillary Clinton and President Joe Biden , in editorials that condemned the Republican in blunt terms.

Trump, while president, had been critical of the billionaire Bezos and the Post, which he purchased in 2013.

"The decision not to publish was made by The Post's owner — Amazon founder Jeff Bezos," the article said, citing two sources briefed on the events.

The newspaper also published an article by two staff reporters saying that editorial page staffers had drafted an endorsement of Democratic nominee Kamala Harris over GOP nominee Donald Trump in the election.

The Washington Post said Friday that it will not endorse a candidate in the presidential election this year, breaking decades of tradition, and sparking immediate criticism of the decision.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos arrives for his meeting with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson at the UK diplomatic residence in New York City, Sept. 20, 2021.

Post publisher and chief executive Will Lewis, in an online explanation of the decision, wrote, "The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election. Nor in any future presidential election."

"We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Lewis wrote.

"We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility," he wrote.

"That is inevitable. We don't see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values The Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects."

Seven of the 13 paragraphs of Lewis' article either quoted at length or referred to Post Editorial Board statements in 1960 and 1972 explaining the paper's rationale for not endorsing presidential candidates in those years, which included its identity as "an independent newspaper."

Lewis noted that the paper had endorsed Jimmy Carter in 1976 "for understandable reasons at the times" — which he did not identify.

"But we had it right before that, and this is what we are going back to," Lewis wrote.

"Our job as the newspaper of the capital city of the most important country in the world is to be independent," he wrote. "And that is what we are and will be."

Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan, a member of the paper's opinions section, resigned following the decision, multiple news outlets reported.

More than 10,000 comments were posted on Lewis' article, many of them blasting the Post for its decision and saying they were canceling their subscriptions.

"The most consequential election in our country, a choice between Fascism and Democracy, and you sit out? Cowards. Unethical, fearful cowards," wrote one reader. "Oh, and by the way, I'm canceling my subscription, because you are putting business ahead of ethics and morals."

The announcement came days after Mariel Garza, the head of The Los Angeles Times' editorial board, resigned in protest after that paper's owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, decided against running a presidential endorsement.

"I am resigning because I want to make it clear that I am not okay with us being silent," Garza told the Columbia Journalism Review. "In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I'm standing up."

Marty Baron, the former editor of The Washington Post, called that paper's decision "cowardice, with democracy as its casualty."

″@realdonaldtrump will see this as an invitation to further intimidate owner @jeffbezos (and others)," Baron wrote. "Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."

The Washington Post Guild, the union that represents the newspaper's staff, in a statement posted on the social media site X said it was "deeply concerned that The Washington Post — an American news institution in the nation's capital — would make a decision to no longer endorse presidential candidates, especially a mere 11 days ahead of an immensely consequential election."

"The message from our chief executive, Will Lewis — not from the Editorial Board itself — makes us concerned that management interfered with the work of our members in Editorial," the Guild said in the statement, which noted the paper's reporting about Bezos' role in the decision.

"We are already seeing cancellations from once loyal readers," the Guild said. "This decision undercuts the work of our members at a time when we should be building our readers' trust, not losing it."

everythingbeeps on October 25th, 2024 at 18:01 UTC »

They can go ahead and remove "Democracy Dies in Darkness" from their tagline.

Maybe replace it with "We Rolled Over and Let Democracy Die"

sirbissel on October 25th, 2024 at 17:58 UTC »

So that's WaPo and the LA Times that have had their owners stop them from endorsing the person they want to endorse thus far?

WhaleFactory on October 25th, 2024 at 17:53 UTC »

Fuck these fucking billionaire fucks