The Daily Populous Friday October 4th, 2024 night edition
Authored by bbc.com and submitted by Pryd3r1

UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius

The UK has announced it is giving up sovereignty of a remote but strategically important cluster of islands in the Indian Ocean after more than half a century. The deal – reached after years of negotiations - will see the UK hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius in a historic move. This includes the tropical atoll of Diego Garcia, used by the US government as a military base for its navy ships and long-range bomber aircraft. The announcement, made in a joint statement by the UK and Mauritian Prime Ministers, ends decades of often fractious negotiations between the two countries.

The US-UK base will remain on Diego Garcia – a key factor enabling the deal to go forward at a time of growing geopolitical rivalries in the region between Western countries, India, and China. The BBC visits the secretive Chagos Islands military base

UN says UK military island not suitable for stranded migrants

UK commitment to Falklands 'unwavering' despite Chagos deal The deal is still subject to finalisation of a treaty, but both sides have promised to complete it as quickly as possible. "This is a seminal moment in our relationship and a demonstration of our enduring commitment to the peaceful resolution of disputes and the rule of law," the statement from UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Mauritius Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth read. The leaders also said they were committed "to ensure the long-term, secure and effective operation of the existing base on Diego Garcia which plays a vital role in regional and global security". The treaty will also "address wrongs of the past and demonstrate the commitment of both parties to support the welfare of Chagossians". UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the benefits of the deal included closing "a potential illegal migration route". Dozens of Sri Lankan Tamils have been held in a fenced camp on the island for three years as complex legal battles are waged over their fate. It is unclear what the announcement will mean for them. The UK will provide a package of financial support to Mauritius, including annual payments and infrastructure investment. Mauritius will also be able to begin a programme of resettlement on the Chagos Islands, but not on Diego Garcia. There, the UK will ensure operation of the military base for "an initial period" of 99 years. US President Joe Biden welcomed the "historic agreement", saying it was a "clear demonstration that through diplomacy and partnership, countries can overcome long-standing historical challenges to reach peaceful and mutually beneficial outcomes". He said it secured the future of a key military base which "plays a vital role in national, regional, and global security." The Chagos islanders themselves – some in Mauritius and the Seychelles, but others living in Crawley in Sussex – do not speak with one voice on the fate of their homeland. Some are determined to return to live on the isolated islands, some are more focused on their rights and status in the UK, while others argue that the archipelago’s status should not be resolved by outsiders. Isabelle Charlot, speaking on BBC Radio 4's World At One programme, said the deal brought back hopes her family could return to her father's island "roots". Plans for the Mauritius government to arrange resettlement would mean a "place that we can call home - where we will be free," she said. But Frankie Bontemps, a second generation Chagossian in the UK, told the BBC that he felt "betrayed" and "angry" at the news because "Chagossians have never been involved" in the negotiations. "We remain powerless and voiceless in determining our own future", he said, and called for the full inclusion of Chagossians in drafting the treaty.

Getty Images The US-UK military operate a highly-secretive base from one of the islands, Diego Garcia

In recent years, the UK has faced rising diplomatic isolation over its claim to what it refers to as the British Indian Ocean Territory, with various United Nations bodies, including its top court and general assembly, overwhelmingly siding with Mauritius and demanding the UK surrender what some have called its "last colony in Africa". The government of Mauritius has long argued that it was illegally forced to give the Chagos Islands away in return for its own independence from the UK in 1968. At the time, the British government had already negotiated a secret deal with the US, agreeing to lease it the largest atoll, Diego Garcia, for use as a military base. Britain later apologised for forcibly removing more than 1,000 islanders from the entire archipelago and promised to hand the islands to Mauritius when they were no longer needed for strategic purposes. But until very recently, the UK insisted that Mauritius itself had no legitimate claim to the islands.

Outside_Error_7355 on October 3rd, 2024 at 10:47 UTC »

The only benefit to holding them for the UK is the military base which it says will remain. Provided the assurances around that are sufficiently solid I suspect that the logic is just that it is no longer worth the reputational hit from holding the islands. Specifically to appease African pressure as part of a general move to get them on side vs Russia etc as the article says.

I assume that the US must have approved such a move and be satisfied that the assurances on the base are iron clad as they will not be giving that up any time soon. Strategically absolutely vital and they will be paranoid about Chinese influence if they give them up.

My view is that I don't think this is really worth it for the UK - this won't be significant enough to really matter to anyone and it was always a niche issue. It will probably make other rumbling disputes (primarily the Falklands, possibly Gibraltar to some extent) flare up. Mauritius are motivated by economics and fishing rights rather than moral outrage primarily anyway. But others will disagree.

GuyfromKK on October 3rd, 2024 at 10:42 UTC »

Would this be the first transfer of sovereignty of a territory between two nations in the 21st century?

Pryd3r1 on October 3rd, 2024 at 10:17 UTC »

Seems to me like the British and US got a pretty good deal, able to maintain their base which is highly strategic to interests in the region. While saving face and not maintaining a remnant of a Colonial empire.