The Daily Populous Friday July 26th, 2024 night edition
Authored by swissinfo.ch and submitted by BezugssystemCH1903

Swiss court ruling: only mothers have legal say in abortion cases

The entrance to the Federal Court – Switzerland's highest – in Lausanne. Keystone / Laurent Gillieron

Switzerland’s highest court has ruled against the father of an unborn child, who had sued his ex-partner for terminating pregnancy at an advanced stage.

Sibilla Bondolfi, SRF Other language: 1 EN original Português pt Justiça suíça decide que só mães têm voz legal em casos de aborto Read more: Justiça suíça decide que só mães têm voz legal em casos de aborto

Abortions are legal in Switzerland if they take place in the first twelve weeks of pregnancy. If a woman has an abortion later, she is punished with up to three years in prison – unless she was deemed to be in an emergency situation.

After a man from the Swiss canton of Fribourg reported his ex-girlfriend for a late-term abortion, the public prosecutor’s office dropped the case as doctors confirmed that the women was in a state of psychological distress.

The man however fought this case up to the level of the Federal Court. He was of the opinion that, as the father of the unborn foetus, he was a “victim” under the definition of the law.

+ How Swiss abortion rights compare internationally

The highest Swiss court sees things differently: it states that the ban on late-term abortions protects the unborn child, not the man involved. And because a foetus does not have legal personality before birth, the father cannot be regarded as a victim. The man from Fribourg could thus not lodge a complaint, the court said.

“The position of the man is extremely weak,” says law professor Bijan Fateh-Moghadam from the University of Basel. “It is up to the mother alone to decide whether to terminate a pregnancy.”

Neither does the father need to be involved in late-stage abortions. The legal scholar believes it is right that the law protects mothers from being pressurised by their partners.

Amnesty International Switzerland takes the same view. “No third party should have the right to oppose a pregnant person’s decision,” says campaigner Cyrielle Huguenot. This is solely the decision of the pregnant woman.

+ Women seeking abortion still experience stigma in Switzerland

Amnesty even wants a complete decriminalisation of abortions, in which case women would not even be penalised for late terminations. However, this is a question that must be decided politically. In the meantime, the Federal Court’s judgement has merely clarified that the father cannot do anything about it if the authorities classify an abortion as legal.

The decision has also been welcomed by the umbrella organisation of Swiss men’s and fathers’ organisations.

“The judgement is correct – indeed, there is no alternative,” says the group’s managing director Markus Theunert. The umbrella organisation understands the father’s wish to have a say. However, “the only way to enforce the father’s right to have a say would inevitably involve men deciding on a woman’s physical integrity” – which is unacceptable, says Theunert.

How we work This news story has been written and carefully fact-checked by an external editorial team. At SWI swissinfo.ch we select the most relevant news for an international audience and use automatic translation tools such as DeepL to translate it into English. Providing you with automatically translated news gives us the time to write more in-depth articles. If you want to know more about how we work, have a look here, if you want to learn more about how we use technology, click here, and if you have feedback on this news story please write to english@swissinfo.ch.

External Content Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again. Almost finished… We need to confirm your email address. To complete the subscription process, please click the link in the email we just sent you. Daily news Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox. Daily Email The SBC Privacy Policy provides additional information on how your data is processed. I consent to the use of my data for the SWI swissinfo.ch newsletter. Subscribe

247GT on July 25th, 2024 at 19:26 UTC »

Pregnancy and childbirth are dangerous endeavors for both mother and child, so much so that it should be regarded entirely as a medical matter. It should never be a political or moral matter. Once the child is born, both mother and child can have any number if conditions, temporary or permanent, that will affect them going forward.

Should any of this anyone else's choice?

worneparlueo on July 25th, 2024 at 16:41 UTC »

This is going to be fun once it hits the front pages.

BezugssystemCH1903 on July 25th, 2024 at 14:33 UTC »

> Switzerland’s highest court has ruled against the father of an unborn child, who had sued his ex-partner for terminating pregnancy at an advanced stage.

> Abortions are legal in Switzerland if they take place in the first twelve weeks of pregnancy. If a woman has an abortion later, she is punished with up to three years in prison – unless she was deemed to be in an emergency situation.

> When a man from the Swiss canton of Fribourg reported his ex-girlfriend for a late-term abortion, the public prosecutor’s office dropped the case after doctors had confirmed that the women was in a state of psychological distress.

> The man however fought this up to the level of the Federal Court. He was of the opinion that, as the father of the unborn foetus, he was a “victim” under the definition of the law.

> The highest Swiss court sees things differently: it states that the ban on late-term abortions protects the unborn child, not the man involved. And because a foetus does not have legal personality before birth, the father cannot be regarded as a victim. The man from Fribourg could thus not lodge a complaint, the court said.

> “The position of the man is extremely weak,” says law professor Bijan Fateh-Moghadam from the University of Basel. “It is up to the mother alone to decide whether to terminate a pregnancy.”

> Neither does the father need to be involved in late-term abortions. The legal scholar believes it is right that the law protects mothers from being pressurised by their partners.

> Amnesty International Switzerland takes the same view. “No third party should have the right to oppose a pregnant person’s decision,” says Amnesty campaigner Cyrielle Huguenot. This is solely the decision of the pregnant woman.

> Amnesty even wants the complete decriminalisation of abortions, in which case women would not be penalised for late terminations. However, this is a question that must be decided politically. In the meantime, the Federal Court’s judgement has merely clarified that the father cannot do anything about it if the authorities classify an abortion as legal.

> And the decision is also welcomed by the umbrella organisation of Swiss men’s and fathers’ organisations.

> “The judgement is correct – indeed, there is no alternative,” says the group’s managing director Markus Theunert. The umbrella organisation understands the father’s wish to have a say. However, “the only way to enforce the father’s right to have a say would inevitably involve men deciding on a woman’s physical integrity” – which is unacceptable, says Theunert.