The Daily Populous Monday July 8th, 2024 day edition
Authored by brookings.edu and submitted by F0urLeafCl0ver

Even before a lasting ceasefire in the Gaza Strip could be attained, the Biden administration has avowed the need to return to the eventual goal of a two-state solution as the foundation of a durable Israeli-Palestinian settlement. But a new survey of Middle East scholars who study the issue suggests that finding such a solution out of the horrific devastation of Gaza is highly unlikely. The latest round of the Middle East Scholar Barometer that we co-direct, with over 750 mostly U.S.-based respondents, reveals that few scholars believe that advancing a two-state solution in the foreseeable future is a realistic option, and a large majority believe that war in Israel and Gaza is likely to lead to new large-scale, long-term displacement of Palestinians from Gaza and/or the West Bank. The Biden administration’s policy gets failing grades from the scholars: More than three-quarters say President Joe Biden’s policy negatively impacts the prospects of peace in Israel and Palestine, U.S. interests in the Middle East, and America’s standing in the world. This unique survey probes opinions on timely issues of Middle East experts from the American Political Science Association, the Project on Middle East Political Science, the American Historical Association, and the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), which we have been conducting on a biannual basis for more than three years. Most of our list and our respondents are political scientists, as are the two of us and the six-member advisory committee. The latest round was conducted from May 23 to June 6. Notably, we found few significant differences between MESA members and those who are not, and between political scientists and other scholars, suggesting that the scholars’ views are not on the whole dependent on their academic discipline or their organizational membership. As we have recently reported in the Chronicle of Higher Education, over 80% of U.S. based scholars say they self-censor when discussing the Israeli-Palestinian issue professionally, mostly speech critical of Israel. The nature of the war in Gaza and Israeli aims Nearly three-quarters of the scholars surveyed, about 72%, expect the war to result in new mass displacements of Palestinians outside of Gaza and the West Bank. This expectation seems partly based on the scholars’ gloomy assessment of Israel’s motives: A majority, about 57%, see making Gaza uninhabitable in order to force Palestinian removal as a primary Israeli objective of the war. About 15% each see Israel’s primary objective to be keeping the current Israeli government in office or destroying Hamas. Few (about 4%) say Israel’s operation is justified by the right of self-defense.

Their assessment of the resultant reality is equally dark: Respondents describe Israeli actions in damning terms, with 41% saying they constitute major war crimes akin to genocide, nearly 34% saying they constitute genocide, and 16% saying they are not akin to genocide, but are still major war crimes. While these views may seem surprising, they are not markedly different from the views of some segments of the American public, especially Democrats, with one recent poll showing a majority of Democrats saying Israeli actions amounted to genocide.

As was the case before the current war, few respondents (2%) describe what now exists in Israel and Palestine as a state of temporary Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, with about two-thirds seeing the reality as that of “a one-state reality akin to Apartheid.” This starting point sets the dark mood for expectations about the present and the future. It’s therefore not surprising that the scholars are pessimistic about any prospect of a two-state solution in the foreseeable future, even as the Biden administration and much of the international community hope it could become a reality in the aftermath of the horrific war. Scholars are divided between those (about 45%) saying a two-state solution was no longer possible, and those (about 43%) saying it is possible, but improbable in the next decade, with few (about 7%) saying it’s both possible and probable in the coming decade. An indictment of Biden’s policy The Biden administration has strongly backed Israel since October 7, 2023, defending its military campaign against critics at home and abroad, criticizing the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice for war crimes investigations, and maintaining a steady flow of military assistance despite clear electoral political costs. Has it been worth it? Middle East scholars say Biden’s Gaza war policy has been detrimental at home and abroad. Fewer than 10% say Biden’s policy positively impacted U.S. standing in the world and American interests in the Middle East.

RBZRBZRBZRBZ on July 8th, 2024 at 03:58 UTC »

Like the Sovietologists of the 1970s and 1980s who failed so deeply at understanding the Soviet Union, these views are group-think, so focused on a narrow subject and academic advancement they fail to see the bigger picture.

The Iranian plan formulated years ago to destroy Israel and exile its population is continuing: https://www.france24.com/en/20190930-top-iran-general-says-destroying-israel-achievable-goal

The Palestinian population has been against a two state solution since the 1931 and 1947 partition plans because it is simply against their deepest belief of Dar Al Islam https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisions_of_the_world_in_Islam, which very few and unpopular (nearly unknown) Islamic scholars dispute.

Even the Egyptian and Jordanian peace treaties with Israel are extremely unpopular and the heads of state who led them were reviled and assassinated or lived under permanent fear of assassination.

The two state solution is not about land or water. It is about belief, and will not end until the Islamic Shiite Scholars of Qom and the Islamic Sunni Scholars of Al Azhar of Cairo agree to a religious justification for not continuing the 100-year project of destroying Israel.

Only the Abraham Accords offer a glimmer of hope to truly modern and reformed leaders and populations.

*Edit: fixed attention error switched Shiite and Sunni

BinRogha on July 7th, 2024 at 22:41 UTC »

Both sides have been radicalized for the forseeable future.

This conflict will only end when both sides are forced to reach a settlement by the rest of the world. Otherwise, it's either genocide or eternal conflict.

F0urLeafCl0ver on July 7th, 2024 at 21:26 UTC »

Middle East scholars are pessimistic about the prospects for a two state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the foreseeable future. Many believe that the latest escalation in the conflict will result in the long-term displacement of Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank.