The Daily Populous Wednesday June 19th, 2024 evening edition
Authored by cnn.com and submitted by nightpanda893

A Boeing 737 MAX 8 is pictured outside the factory on March 11, 2019 in Renton, Washington. Stephen Brashear/Getty Images

Despite the attention Tuesday’s hearing about Boeing’s safety problems will garner, it’s not clear whether it will produce significant change at the company, said Richard Aboulafia, managing partner for AeroDynamic Consultancy, an aerospace advisory firm.

“Nothing has produced change (at Boeing) except frustration from a bunch of airline customers,” Aboulafia said. “I’m not sure what will change as a consequence of this. He (Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun) needs to go. He has shown a strong desire to double down on what’s bad.”

Calhoun announced plans to retire before the end of this year. His successor has yet to be selected. Calhoun said he has a preferred candidate but he has not publicly identified that person and said the decision is up to the search committee and Boeing’s board.

Aboulafia said the board has shown little indication of seeing a need to change the way things are done at Boeing, calling it a “board on autopilot.” The board approved a $32.8 million pay package for Calhoun in 2023, a 45% increase from the $22.6 million he received for 2022. And it could have been a lot more: He declined to accept his annual incentive bonus of $2.8 million – a request the board said he made after the Alaska Air incident.

At the end of the hearing Tuesday Calhoun pointed out that there have been changes among Boeing top mangers since the two fatal crashes and the grounding of the Max in 2019 and 2020, as well as additional management changes since the Alaska Air incident.

He defended using internal candidates from Boeing to fill the open positions.

“We try to select people who know a lot about airplanes,” he said.

But Senator Richard Blumenthal, the chairman of the subcommittee, argued that Boeing needed to turn to outsiders to make a true change in the culture at the company.

Madlib_Artichoke on June 19th, 2024 at 03:15 UTC »

> "He said that one whistleblower, John Barnett, who police ruled died by suicide earlier this year, had testified that a supervisor had called him about 20 times a day, and when Barnett questioned the calls, he was told by the supervisor “I’m going to push you until you break.”

In a perfect world, this supervisor would experience the same treatment Barnett received. Unbelievable.

notcaffeinefree on June 19th, 2024 at 02:25 UTC »

If a company is so large and intertwined in the government's contracts that apply large penalties to that company would result in harm to the government itself, then the company needs to be forced to operate differently. Getting a free-pass on constantly breaking laws shouldn't be a thing.

palmmoot on June 19th, 2024 at 01:29 UTC »

If only there was an Act to punish people who relate against Whistleblowers. We could call it the Whistleblower Projection Act of 1989 or something.

Edit: Jesus Christ this blew up. Sorry for the typos y'all, I meant retaliate and Protection. I'm leaving them as is, so as to not retaliate against the whistleblowers below who have properly reported me for them.