The Daily Populous Thursday May 23rd, 2024 night edition
Authored by huffpost.com and submitted by OtmShanks55

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls. Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support. Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all. Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.

The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season? HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story. Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.

It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free. But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press. Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all. Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.

Dear HuffPost Reader Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone. The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

reader3491 on May 22nd, 2024 at 12:22 UTC »

Each box is another nail in the coffin of the rule of law in the US. I should say, the 7000th coffin, because the others already ran out of room for more nails.

baylaust on May 22nd, 2024 at 12:05 UTC »

The most frustrating thing about this is that although this is one of the most damaging cases against him going at the moment, it's also the most obvious that he's guilty of.

A president can take classified documents out of the white house, but once they're no longer president, they must be returned in their entirety. You can't keep them in your house forever. We know this, Trump knows this, he has been recorded saying that he knows he shouldn't have them, and he went out of his way to try and hide them from the FBI.

Of course, if he declassified them, that's a different story. But he didn't. We know he didn't. He knows he didn't. And yet again, he has been recorded saying that he never declassified them.

This should be the most obvious open and shut case against him. But because all the stars aligned in his favour (which seems to be a running theme), he got the most comically in-his-pocket judge he could have asked for to handle the case.

moreobviousthings on May 22nd, 2024 at 11:13 UTC »

New evidence = new charges? With new judge?