Congress is running out of time to pass major legislative priorities before the winter holidays, including a government funding bill, billions in emergency aid to Ukraine and Israel, and possibly tougher immigration reforms.
So naturally, House Republicans spent Wednesday passionately defending something else that they warned could decide the fate of Christmas itself: milk. Whole milk, to be precise.
“We want only the most nutritional option for Santa,” Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) argued on the House floor. “Whole milk is the unsung hero of his Christmas journey.”
Santa Claus needs to drink whole milk “to travel the whole globe in one night,” she said, perhaps confusing the effects of dairy with amphetamines. “Protein helps build and repair Santa’s muscles. Hoisting heavy sacks of gifts up and down the chimney is no easy task.”
“You see, it’s not just the magic of the season that helps Santa deliver presents worldwide. It’s also the fortifying nutrients of whole milk,” Foxx continued. “Reflecting on Christmas traditions this year begs the question, ‘If whole milk is a good option to fuel Santa’s extraordinary Christmas Eve journey, then why isn’t it an option for American schoolchildren in their lunchrooms?’”
“Protein helps build and repair Santa’s muscles," says Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.). "Hoisting heavy sacks of gifts up and down the chimney is no easy task.” Tom Williams via Getty Images
While her concerns about Santa’s muscles may be real, Foxx was actually making the case for passing a bill to allow whole milk back into school lunch programs. The legislation by Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.) would bypass a USDA and HHS advisory committee of child nutrition experts ― and the dietary guidelines they set ― to serve whole milk in schools, which have only offered low-fat and fat-free milk for the last decade or so.
Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), who led opposition to the bill, noted that virtually every major public health organization agrees that low-fat and fat-free milk are the healthiest options for children, as whole milk is higher in saturated fat. The American Heart Association, the American Public Health Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics are among the groups opposing this bill.
But invoking so-called “experts” wasn’t enough to waive Republicans off of this fight. Foxx offered a powerful counterpoint.
“I’d just like to tell my colleague something that I think will be easy to remember about why we’re doing this,” said the North Carolina Republican. “Scientists slash experts designed the Titanic, amateurs designed... uh, designed... scientists, experts built the Titanic, and amateurs built the Arc.”
When one Democrat suggested that soy milk would be a better, more easily digestible option in schools than whole milk, Foxx scoffed.
“It is not milk. It is a plant-based food,” she said. “It isn’t milk, so you can’t call it soy milk. You can call it ‘soy drink.’”
“Neither is almond milk,” Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) later insisted. “Milk comes from a mammal.”
Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.) warned of the Chinese Communist Party “infiltrating school lunches" with its milk. CSPAN
Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) said she supports the bill and pointed out that she raised her seven children on whole fat milk, and “they’re all within normal weight.” (Saturated fat in whole milk can increase your risk of heart disease and stroke, not necessarily your weight.)
“I also have recognized that children with high-fat diets stay full longer,” she said.
It was clear, even amid their jokes about this udderly ridiculous debate, that Republicans were determined to defend whole milk in this battle against, well, scientific evidence.
“Let’s end the war on milk,” Foxx declared.
Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.) warned of the Chinese Communist Party “infiltrating school lunches” if the U.S. doesn’t produce enough of its own milk. He even brought a poster featuring a milk carton with President Xi’s face on it, against the backdrop of the Chinese flag.
This is about “safeguarding our national security,” said Mills, offering an amendment to the bill to bar Chinese Communist Party entities from putting their milk into public schools.
But Scott pointed out that his amendment is “unnecessary” since school lunch programs are already required to buy domestic agricultural commodities, and there is plenty of milk to go around.
“I understand that FACTS, for whatever reason, seem to sink in a lot slower on the left than they do in America’s party,” Mills grumbled in response.
Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Wis.) also showed up with a poster that read, in all caps, COME AND TAKE IT. It featured a tiny brown carton of milk.
He gave a passionate defense of chocolate milk.
“Some may ask, why are we focusing on this issue?” Tiffany said to his colleagues. “The USDA has its sights on getting rid of chocolate milk in schools. It’s now up to us to act.”
“Come and take it, USDA,” he taunted.
Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Wis.) gave a passionate defense of chocolate milk. CSPAN
When Scott again pointed out that child nutrition experts recommend that kids stick to low-fat and less sugary milks, Tiffany questioned the point of experts.
“Ohhh, those experts. Those experts. They’ve done us so well in the United States of America. Why are we $33 trillion in debt?” wondered the Wisconsin Republican, whose party in 2017 overwhelmingly voted for trillions of dollars in tax cuts for rich people and corporations.
“Those experts that told us that butter is not good for us. Remember that?” he continued. “Well all of a sudden, they’re changing their tune on that.”
Tiffany said he’ll never forget the day that he was at a local gas station and a school lunch director who he didn’t know came up to him and asked him to “tell the federal government to get out of our school lunch program.”
“I had multiple school lunch directors across northern Wisconsin, in my district, say, ‘Federal government, stay out of our school lunch programs,’” he said, perhaps missing the irony of his words and his actions. “‘We know what we’re doing.’”
Scott replied that Congress should probably base its decisions “on science, not what somebody tells us at the gas station.”
In the end, though, whole milk overcame its haters. The House passed the bill, 330 to 99, and may have saved Christmas.
Support HuffPost The Stakes Have Never Been Higher At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone. Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people. Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way. At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone. Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way. As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost's journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls. We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month. As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls. Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.