We and our partners use technologies, such as cookies , and collect browsing data to give you the best online experience and to personalise the content and advertising shown to you. Please let us know if you agree.
Manage consent settings on AMP pages
These settings apply to AMP pages only. You may be asked to set these preferences again when you visit non-AMP BBC pages.
The lightweight mobile page you have visited has been built using Google AMP technology.
To make our web pages work, we store some limited information on your device without your consent.
Read more about the essential information we store on your device to make our web pages work.
We use local storage to store your consent preferences on your device.
When you consent to data collection on AMP pages you are consenting to allow us to display personalised ads that are relevant to you when you are outside of the UK.
Read more about how we personalise ads in the BBC and our advertising partners.
You can choose not to receive personalised ads by clicking “Reject data collection and continue” below. Please note that you will still see advertising, but it will not be personalised to you.
You can change these settings by clicking “Ad Choices / Do not sell my info” in the footer at any time.
jschubart on May 15th, 2023 at 15:33 UTC »
Traditionally the Thai military has not been a fan of letting go of power.
One big difference in this election is that both rural areas and urban areas voted them out. Previously a government would get elected by rural areas and the urban areas would have the military luck them out.
the-hottest-of-damns on May 15th, 2023 at 13:17 UTC »
Good luck to Thailand, you deserve democratic representation
MrJoyless on May 15th, 2023 at 12:04 UTC »
Now, does the army let go? Or hold on tighter.