Republicans Finally Admit They Have No Incriminating Evidence on Joe Biden

Authored by newrepublic.com and submitted by thenewrepublic
image for Republicans Finally Admit They Have No Incriminating Evidence on Joe Biden

Knowing what we now know about how the trial went, it’s easy to think this was a breeze. Carroll was a rock on the stand. Her corroborating witnesses were strong. Joe Tacopina, Trump’s attorney, came across about as badly as a lawyer who cares about his reputation could: as a bully defending an accused sexual abuser. Trump’s videotaped deposition, in which he literally confused Carroll with second wife, Marla, was embarrassing for him. Well, that part was embarrassing. The part where he said men have raped women for a million years, “fortunately or unfortunately,” was a little worse than that.

But this was no breeze. This took guts. It took tremendous courage to file this suit and see it through, eat all the shit that Trump’s lackeys would try to force-feed her, deal with whatever kinds of threats she faced—and most of all, to run the risk of losing. Because losing would have been awful, for her and for the country. But she knew the truth, and she was confident that she could convince a jury of the truth.

HaveNot1 on May 10th, 2023 at 19:14 UTC »

Great! Now let the committee turn its attention to Jared Kushner's $2B Saudi deal.

Darthrevan4ever on May 10th, 2023 at 18:53 UTC »

Biden is such a criminal genius yet somehow also demented and senile that he hides all the evidence in his ice-cream. Probably a future headline on faux.

mnorthwood13 on May 10th, 2023 at 18:47 UTC »

four months, 65 pages, zero proof.

What a goose chase