Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan once turned down a care package of bagels and lox, per Forward.
She was concerned she could be violating the court's ethics rules for accepting gifts, friends said.
Meanwhile, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was accepting lavish holidays from a GOP megadonor.
Top editors give you the stories you want — delivered right to your inbox each weekday. Loading Something is loading. Thanks for signing up! Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed while you're on the go. download the app Email address By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
At a time when Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was accepting lavish trips paid for by GOP megadonor Harlan Crow, fellow Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan was turning down bagels and lox from high school friends, over concerns she could be violating the court's ethics rules for accepting gifts, according to a new report.
Forward reported that friends who attended Hunter College High School in Manhattan with Kagan in the 1970s wanted to send her a "care package" of bagels, lox, babka, chocolates, and other inexpensive items in February 2021.
However, they later scrapped the idea after Kagan expressed concerns about issues it could pose under the Supreme Court's rules on gifts and disclosures, per Forward.
"We thought it would be a sign of support to send her some lox, but she was too ethical to take the lox," said Sarah Schulman, a former school friend, according to the media outlet.
Another Hunter College High School alumnus, Ann Starer, told the Forward that Kagan was touched by the offer but it was "creating more stress for her than it was worth."
She said that Kagan sent her an email, which reportedly said: "I have to take these ethics and reporting considerations very seriously."
Kagan's approach seems to directly contrast with that of Thomas when it comes to accepting gifts.
A series of bombshell ProPublica reports have put Thomas at the center of an ongoing scandal involving Crow, a Texas billionaire.
According to the reports, Crow financed expensive trips that Thomas took part in for more than two decades, purchased his mother's home and didn't charge her rent, and paid for a child in the justice's custody to attend a $6,000-a-month private boarding school.
Under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, all federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, are required to file annual financial disclosures that include reporting on gifts received. But they are exempt from disclosing "personal hospitality" they receive, which covers food, lodging, and entertainment.
And unlike the rest of the federal judiciary, the Supreme Court is not bound by a code of conduct.
Top Democrats have called on the Supreme Court to investigate Thomas, as well as calling on the court to adopt a public code of ethics.
The Supreme Court did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.
CrescendoAnnie on May 11st, 2023 at 12:22 UTC »
I am a federal employee. We have to complete yearly ethics training. Part of that training includes very strict rules on not accepting monetary gifts. I was on a very small committee that was given $200 from an anonymous donor. I got so many hostile emails from my superiors at work about why we weren’t allowed to accept the money. This was for a very small hand hygiene committee at a hospital. The money was quickly returned. Politics aside I am surprised Mr. Thomas has not been swiftly removed or punished.
imnotinyourfoodchain on May 11st, 2023 at 12:17 UTC »
31 years ago Anita Hill warned them all about Clarence Thomas. As usual, they didn’t listen.
Slippinjimmyforever on May 11st, 2023 at 12:16 UTC »
The stories about Thomas need to keep running through the 2024 elections. The senate needs a larger majority to bring this POS into a senate hearing that will result in his dismissal. Right now they can’t. They petitioned him for one, which he obviously declined.