U.S. food additives banned in Europe: Expert says what Americans eat is "almost certainly" making them sick

Authored by cbsnews.com and submitted by Additional-Force-795

London — From baguettes to focaccia, Europe is famous for its bread. But there's one ingredient conspicuously missing: Potassium bromate. It's a suspected carcinogen that's banned for human consumption in Europe, China and India, but not in the United States.

In the U.S., the chemical compound is used by some food makers, usually in the form of fine crystals or powder, to strengthen dough. It is estimated to be present in more than 100 products.

"There is evidence that it may be toxic to human consumers, that it may even either initiate or promote the development of tumors," professor Erik Millstone, an expert on food additives at England's University of Sussex, told CBS News. He said European regulators take a much more cautious approach to food safety than their U.S. counterparts.

Asked if it can be said with certainty that differences in regulations mean people in the U.S. have developed cancers that they would not have developed if they'd been eating exclusively in Europe, Millstone said that was "almost certainly the conclusion that we could reach."

It's not just potassium bromate. A range of other chemicals and substances banned in Europe over health concerns are also permitted in the U.S., including Titanium dioxide (also known as E171); Brominated vegetable oil (BVO) (E443); Potassium bromate (E924); Azodicarbonamide (E927a) and Propylparaben (E217).

Millstone, who's spent almost half a century researching food and agriculture science, said most Americans were likely completely unaware that they were being exposed on a daily basis to substances in their food viewed as dangerous in Europe.

"They probably just think, 'Well, if it's available or it's in the store, it's probably fine,'" he said.

In a statement to CBS News, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said all food additives require "pre-market evaluation" and "regulations require evidence that each substance is safe at its intended level of use before it may be added to foods."

"Post-approval, our scientists continue to review relevant new information to determine whether there are safety questions and whether the use of such substance is no longer safe," the agency added.

Stacy McNamara is from upstate New York, but she has lived in London for a decade. She said raising children in the U.K. had opened her eyes to what's allowed in foods in the U.S.

McNamara has no plans to ever move back home, and she told CBS News that food safety was "for sure" a part of that decision.

In a statement to CBS News, the FDA said that when used properly, potassium bromate converts into a harmless substance during food production.

The FDA acknowledged, however, that not all of the compound used in any given recipe may convert during the production process, but that control measures were utilized to minimize the amount in final products.

TheDunadan29 on February 21st, 2023 at 06:43 UTC »

Just to present some informed information about these substances I looked them up. Below is what I found about each. This is not meant to be definitive, and there are further arguments for both sides, and there's some places where likely more research is needed. These are not my opinions, but what seem to be the present arguments condensed for conciseness.

The substances mentioned in the article are:

Potassium bromate. It is used to speed up oxidation in many bread flours. This helps develop a better gluten content which is important in the texture and flavor of many breads. It also helps with bleaching the flour.

The concern: potassium bromate has been linked to thyroid, kidney, and other cancers in mice. So yeah not good.

Why the FDA allows it: the process of baking should leave negligible amounts behind. As it reacts with the bread dough and heat during cooking it is transformed into relatively harmless potassium bromide (not linked to cancer). They also do have a requirement that the bromate can't exceed 20 ppb (parts per billion) in the finished product. So it's not entirely unregulated.

Why it should be banned: if you don't get it hot enough in the oven, and cook it so the potassium bromate has time to complete the reaction, or if too much is added in the ingredients, you can have a larger amount in your food. Also notable, the FDA doesn't ban it, but they do recommend food companies to voluntarily abandon its use. California also requires companies to note on their products that contain it that it was in use.

Source: Source: https://www.livescience.com/36206-truth-potassium-bromate-food-additive.html

Titanium dioxide. It is used in food primarily as pigments. Basically anything that has white color and it is just excellent at getting that perfect bright white color. It can also be found directly in food such as ice cream, chocolate, candy, creamers, desserts, marshmallows, chewing gum, pastries, spreads, dressings, cakes, and more. It is also used in toothpaste and cosmetic products. And also used in most plastics, so like the plastic utensils, cups plates, etc.

Why the FDA allows it: as of 2006 it was deemed as completely non-toxic in humans. It is also found naturally in many rocks and minerals. But recently concerns have arisen that nano-particles may be harmful when inhaled. In factories that produce products that use it people have developed higher rates of lung cancer. However, it's unclear how a food ban changes the threat to factory workers since the issue is inhalation, and there are other products such as paints, ceramics, and non-food plastics it would still be used for.

Why it should be banned: pretty much the above. Though it seems Europe is on the forefront of this one with most bans happening after 2020. I would say this is one where more research may be needed.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium_dioxide?wprov=sfla1

Brominated vegetable oil (BVO). Used in various beverages containing citrus flavors, it keeps the citrus part from separating from the rest of the ingredients and floating to the top. Basically most soft drinks, and many other drinks that have citrus flavors.

Why the FDA allows it: this is actually a regulated substance in foods in the US since 1970, and limited to 15 ppm (parts per million).

Why it should be banned: it can cause Bromism, which is the overconsumption of Bromide. This condition is quite rare these days, since government agencies recognized the danger and regulated products that contained it. But it sounds pretty awful:

One case reported that a man who consumed two to four liters of a soda containing BVO on a daily basis experienced memory loss, tremors, fatigue, loss of muscle coordination, headache, and ptosis of the right eyelid, as well as elevated serum chloride (messed up his kidneys).

Though it should also be noted that with treatment the man in the above case was able to recover and reverse the effects.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brominated_vegetable_oil?wprov=sfla1

Azodicarbonamide. It is used as a dough conditioner. Again it aids in oxidation and in bleaching the flour.

Why the FDA allows it: it is a regulated substance, being limited to 45 ppm (parts per million). It is generally considered safe to ingest.

Why it should be banned: workers preparing the dough who inhale the flour particulates have been linked to higher rates of respiratory issues, allergies and asthma. And while still allowed by the FDA, negative press and general sentiments have caused its use to be decreased over time. Notably Wendy's and Subway used to use it for their bread doughs, but have since voluntarily moved away from using it due to negative public opinion.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azodicarbonamide?wprov=sfla1

Polyparaben. It is used as a flavor enhancer and preservative. It is antimicrobial and antifungal. It can be found in food, and in cosmetics. It's also an ingredient in some medications.

Why the FDA allows it: it is non-toxic, and is generally safe for ingestion and topical use.

Why it should be banned: it is a known skin and eye irritant, and also irritating if inhaled. There was at least one study, which is what the WHO used to recommend banning its use, in which the tissue of the reproductive organs of male rats were notably damaged.

Source: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Propylparaben#:~:text=Propylparaben%20is%20the%20benzoate%20ester,agent%20and%20an%20antimicrobial%20agent

In all, I think there are good reasons to consider a ban on some of these substances. But the FDA also isn't just letting people go hog wild either. In some cases I think a ban may be appropriate, in other cases I think Europe is erring on the side of caution, and more studies need to be done to confirm. In the meantime I would say this article is a bit unfair in representing the US as crazy backwards for not banning these substances outright. I also don't think it does an adequate job of representing that many of these substances are regulated by the FDA. And each has been evaluated by the FDA, and they continue to evaluate these substances.

Edit: thank you all for the kind words and awards. I tried to DM the ones that popped up, but if I missed you, thank you!

ahkmanim on February 21st, 2023 at 03:53 UTC »

Wasn't this all over the news 6-7 years ago (maybe longer)? I thought companies stopped using potassium bromate.

Lastron on February 21st, 2023 at 03:39 UTC »

Quite a few countries have been banning it as food additive since the 90’s like Australia,Argentina,Canada,Peru,Korea,Nigeria,NZ etc..

https://thefooduntold.com/food-science/what-is-potassium-bromate-e924-and-why-many-countries-have-banned-it-in-baked-products/