Movie fans disappointed that their favorite actor was cut from a film after appearing in the trailer can sue the studio for false advertising, a US judge has ruled.
Two film buffs say Universal Pictures tricked them into renting 2019 flick "Yesterday" because the trailer featured actress Ana de Armas.
Peter Michael Rosza, 45, of San Diego, and Conor Woulfe, 39, of Maryland, say they forked over $3.99 each to watch the Richard Curtis comedy on Amazon Prime, only to discover that de Armas had not made the final cut.
A class action suit filed earlier this year alleges fans had been led to expect the Cuban "No Time To Die" star would feature prominently.
However, they "did not receive a movie with any appearance of Ana de Armas at all," says the suit, reported by US media on Friday.
Accordingly, "such consumers were not provided with any value for their rental or purchase," the suit added.
Universal had asked US District Judge Stephen Wilson to throw out the complaint, arguing that trailers are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees free speech.
But in his ruling on Thursday, Wilson rejected the studio's argument, saying trailers are commercial speech and subject to laws around honest advertising.
"At its core, a trailer is an advertisement designed to sell a movie by providing consumers with a preview of the movie," the judge wrote.
AFP could not immediately reach a representative for Universal.
The suit is claiming at least $5 million on behalf of disappointed fans.
Lawyers will convene again for the case on April 3.
Danny Boyle's "Yesterday" tells the story of a musician, played by Himesh Patel, who is thrust into an alternative reality where The Beatles do not exist.
He achieves global megastardom by releasing the Fab Four's back catalogue as his own.
De Armas, 34, who also appeared in "Knives Out" in 2019, was originally cast in the movie, and appeared in the trailer and certain advertising, but her role did not make the final version, according to the suit.
s-mores on December 25th, 2022 at 22:00 UTC »
Can't help but feel this will lead into worse trailers. The bad ones already feature most of the plot and cool action scenes (black adam comes to mind) while the good ones just sort of hint at what the movie has going on while keeping last 1/3 of the movie.
Here it's pretty obvious that an actress is featured but isn't in the actual movie, which is all kinds of ridiculous. But where does "I thought movie would be x" end?
wharlie on December 25th, 2022 at 21:52 UTC »
(◔_◔)
Gaming industry
KingNathan90 on December 25th, 2022 at 21:31 UTC »
What about when a movie trailer is misleading on purpose? Cabin in the Woods comes to mind.