US railroad workers vote down proposed contract

Authored by aljazeera.com and submitted by KingDorkFTC

A strike could freeze up to 30 percent of cargo shipments as workers voice frustration over quality-of-life issues.

Members of the largest railroad union in the United States have voted against a potential contract deal, raising the possibility of a strike.

In a vote on Monday, train and engine service workers in the transportation division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (SMART-TD) rejected a tentative deal that was reached in September.

“The ball is now in the railroads’ court. Let’s see what they do. They can settle this at the bargaining table,” said SMART-TD president Jeremy Ferguson in a statement.

Union voters cited unmet quality of life issues, including demanding schedules, among the reasons for rejecting the deal.

Railroad companies, meanwhile, have refused to budge on issues like paid sick leave and have not indicated that they are willing to resume negotiations, raising the possibility of intervention by the United States Congress to avoid a massive strike that could roil the country’s supply chain.

The vote comes amid an uptick in labour organising in the US, as workers push for greater compensation and better working conditions.

While SMART-TD members rejected the contract on Monday, another large railroad union, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET), voted in its favour. Both unions, along with 10 smaller ones, must approve new contracts to avoid a strike.

Seven of the 12 unions previously approved the deal. Three voted against it but agreed to extend a strike deadline until early December.

The deal stems from an emergency board convened by US President Joe Biden earlier this year to avoid costly freight disruptions. A rail shutdown could freeze up to 30 percent of US cargo shipments by weight, impacting various sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing and retail.

Biden’s Presidential Emergency Board issued a 124-page report in August that laid the groundwork for the five-year contract deal. The proposal includes a cumulative 24 percent raise for workers and a $5,000 bonus over five years. Railroad companies have called the agreement the most “generous wage package in almost 50 years”.

The US Congress has the power to impose contract terms if an agreement is not reached in time to avoid a strike. Business groups have urged Biden, who helped broker the tentative contract in September, to be prepared to intervene.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre called a shutdown “completely unacceptable” last month and said it was the “responsibility of the parties involved to resolve this issue”.

The group that negotiates on behalf of railroad companies stated on Monday that unions should not expect to receive more than was outlined by the emergency board.

If Congress were to intervene, it is not clear which group that intervention would favour. Republican lawmakers could push unions to accept the terms laid out by the Presidential Emergency Board, while Democratic lawmakers could push for additional concessions from the railroads.

caligaris_cabinet on November 22nd, 2022 at 20:51 UTC »

Am a logistics manager. A strike would be devastating and make my job so much more difficult with missing critical milestones on inbounded containers. Clueless executives and the sales team will be yelling at me wondering why their product is delayed and my answer won’t be good enough. Probably even cost me my annual bonus.

With all that, I fully support the railroad workers. More power to them should they strike. They have real problems while this would just be another inconvenience in a long line of logistical inconveniences for me.

Support the unions!

TConductor on November 22nd, 2022 at 18:56 UTC »

Earlier this year at BNSF we attempted to strike through federal courts because we were the last Class 1 with a some what decent attendance policy. We were chastised by Federal Judge Mark Pittman for attempting to strike during a supply chain crisis and essentially told to shut up and go back to work. What has followed at BNSF has been unheard of. Over 2,000 employees have quit, the majority with 5-20 years which has never happened on the railroads before. We didn't have enough people to run trains out of the majority of ports or across the transcon. Entire grain trains were transloaded to trucks because they sat for over 2 weeks. Had we been allowed to strike for 1 day, we would have been the one railroad with a decent workforce, and able to move freight. That didn't happen because a Federal Judge was to stupid to look at the big picture.

Konukaame on November 22nd, 2022 at 17:17 UTC »

Give them their sick leave.

Give them their safety measures.

Seriously, what the actual fuck.