Really nice edit, I personally love it (check out my shot from my profile, some similar concepts applied).
As some small constructive feedback—I appreciate you shooting ISO 100 for low noise, but i’d recommend to compromise a bit for next time…shoot like ISO 400, maybe 640-800 even, to allow for a shorter shutter speed—so you get less star trails, and have the moon with less motion/with stronger sharpness.
It looks great at full crop, but when you zoom in you can see the exposure is just a touch long for the focal length to avoid star trails and has a slightly blurred moon from motion.
But I love it overall, and see nothing wrong with using the dynamic range of the A7RIV to bump up the brightness of the power lines. That’s what photo editing is and I think it was tasteful enough.
Scrotchety on November 9th, 2022 at 00:23 UTC »
This is my favorite so far of the lunar eclipse submissions
umastryx on November 9th, 2022 at 01:38 UTC »
After drawing so much and using digital tools. Im getting to the point where sometimes any photo just looks like a photobash.
Samsky on November 9th, 2022 at 11:12 UTC »
Really nice edit, I personally love it (check out my shot from my profile, some similar concepts applied).
As some small constructive feedback—I appreciate you shooting ISO 100 for low noise, but i’d recommend to compromise a bit for next time…shoot like ISO 400, maybe 640-800 even, to allow for a shorter shutter speed—so you get less star trails, and have the moon with less motion/with stronger sharpness.
It looks great at full crop, but when you zoom in you can see the exposure is just a touch long for the focal length to avoid star trails and has a slightly blurred moon from motion.
But I love it overall, and see nothing wrong with using the dynamic range of the A7RIV to bump up the brightness of the power lines. That’s what photo editing is and I think it was tasteful enough.