The DOJ pushed back against Donald Trump's claim the FBI planted evidence.
it released an updated inventory of items it seized from Mar-a-Lago.
Neither Trump nor his attorneys have backed his planting claim with evidence.
Sign up for our newsletter to receive our top stories based on your reading preferences — delivered daily to your inbox. Loading Something is loading. Email address By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The Justice Department rejected Donald Trump's claim the FBI planted evidence in the August 8 search of Mar-a-Lago and challenged the former president to provide evidence to back it.
In legal filings Monday, the DOJ submitted a list of all of the items retrieved by the FBI in the search, which contains slight changes from an earlier inventory and an affidavit from an agent saying it was all retrieved in the search.
The DOJ only had one day to complete the earlier list submitted in August, and the new inventory filters out some material that might be protected under privilege rules, shielding some communications by the president.
The affidavit says the list is a "full and accurate" description of items found in storage facilities and private rooms at Trump's Palm Beach resort.
"I am not aware of any documents or materials seized from the Premises on that date by the FBI that are not reflected in the Revised Detailed Property Inventory … other than materials that the Privilege Review Team has not provided to the Case Team," the affidavit said.
Judge Raymond Dearie, the special master appointed by a federal judge to review the documents seized, had requested that the DOJ provide an inventory of the items retrieved from Mar-a-Lago, and has given Trump's legal team a Friday deadline to provide evidence showing what items were not kept at the luxury country club.
In a filing Tuesday, the DOJ more broadly challenged Trump to back his arguments with evidence in a filing on delays in digitizing records to be turned over to Dearie.
"Plaintiff will need to participate in the process by categorizing documents and providing sworn declarations as the Amended Case Management Plan contemplates," the DOJ's attorneys write.
Trump, his allies, and some of his attorneys have for weeks in media interviews been pushing the conspiracy theory that evidence was planted at Mar-a-Lago. The former president has sought to portray the raid as part of a political witch hunt against him.
But his lawyers have notably not made this argument in court, where knowingly presenting false claims can be punished. They have also not presented evidence for his claim that he declassified swaths of top secret documents retrieved by the FBI in the search.
Trump's lawyers went to court to get the appointment of a special master in the case, which delayed the FBI's probe. But some legal experts have said the move appears to have backfired, with Dearie exposing flaws and inconsistencies in the defenses mounted by Trump and his lawyers.
eurocomments247 on September 28th, 2022 at 12:37 UTC »
"Many people say..." is their defense.
Also, did the FBI plant the documents before or after Trump scribbled notes on them? The scribbling is the one thing they have actually submitted to court, so they are stuck with it.
petulant_dinosaur on September 28th, 2022 at 11:39 UTC »
His lawyer is already jumping ship too. It's all fun and games until your bar admission is on the line for lying for this fuckwad
dutchiegeet32 on September 28th, 2022 at 11:32 UTC »
Mar-a-lago is strongly under surveillance so clips or it didn't happen...