Bernie Sanders says he’ll vote against keeping the government open if Manchin’s ‘disastrous side-deal’ on energy is included

Authored by businessinsider.com and submitted by socks_optional
image for Bernie Sanders says he’ll vote against keeping the government open if Manchin’s ‘disastrous side-deal’ on energy is included

Sanders said he'd oppose a short-term government funding bill if it included a Manchin deal on energy.

The bill is set to ease regulations around building a new oil pipeline.

He also warned of a looming revolt among House Democrats.

Sign up for our newsletter to receive our top stories based on your reading preferences — delivered daily to your inbox. Loading Something is loading. Email address By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont said on Thursday that he'd oppose a short-term government funding bill if Democratic leaders attached legislation meant to ease construction of crude oil pipelines and other energy infrastructure.

"I will not vote for any bill that makes it easier for Big Oil to destroy the planet and that includes approving the Mountain Valley Pipeline," the Vermont independent wrote on Twitter. "The Continuing Resolution must not be held hostage by Big Oil."

The continuing resolution is a bill designed to keep the government funded for several weeks while Democrats and Republicans craft a year-long spending bill. The measure includes permitting reforms meant to speed up the approval of energy infrastructure projects including the Mountain Valley Pipeline in Sen. Joe Manchin's home state of West Virginia.

Sanders took to the Senate floor and pummeled the legislation, which Democratic leaders and President Joe Biden agreed to pass in an effort to secure Manchin's vote for the Inflation Reduction Act last month. Winning Manchin's support was crucial for the party to advance the slimmed-down version of Biden's economic agenda.

Progressive Democrats have fervently pushed back against the inclusion of the reforms, arguing they give the oil industry a boost when the country should be investing in renewable energy. The inclusion of permitting changes reflects a "disastrous side-deal" between Manchin and Democratic leadership, Sanders said, adding the reforms are in opposition with the energy policy the US should be pursuing.

"At a time when climate change is threatening the very existence of our planet, why would anyone be talking about substantially increasing carbon emissions and fossil fuel production?" Sanders said. He also warned of a revolt among House Democrats, saying "at least" 59 Democratic lawmakers would release a letter stating their opposition to the deal.

Manchin defended his position on Thursday, noting that the IRA included funding for several kinds of clean energy projects. Still, the senator from West Virginia argued that increased energy production from fossil fuels is needed to address more pressing energy demands.

"If I thought it was damaging for climate, I'd have never done it," Manchin told Insider. "We're talking about solar farms, wind farms, but we have to have the fossil horsepower that we need right now."

electricfoxyboy on September 9th, 2022 at 10:30 UTC »

The modern game of threatening to shut down the government as a political pawn is not okay. Screwing with the paychecks of 1.8 million people is NOT okay regardless of the side of the political aisle you are on.

TemetN on September 9th, 2022 at 04:25 UTC »

I'm more bemused this was designed this way, not only is this terrible policy, but why in the world would try to stick this into a CR right before a midterm? This is like asking to take a pummeling in the polls. Terrible design.

CaptainNoBoat on September 9th, 2022 at 03:38 UTC »

I absolutely hate that element of the (verbal) deal, although the greater climate package is 100x beyond that.

But.. the Dem caucus (Bernie included, independent or not) agreed to it and passed it knowing that was Manchin's demand to get him to the finish line.

It isn't directly attached to the IRA, and Bernie has every right to oppose it, but I seriously doubt he's going to cause a government shutdown on September 30th before the midterms with a ton of Dem momentum against Republicans, who can cause far more damage with gains than anything Manchin's provisions ever could do.

It's fine to posture and fight for what you believe in, but I think Manchin is ultimately going to get his deal here, and Bernie will vote for funding.