Judge strikes down 1931 Michigan law criminalizing abortion

Authored by washingtonpost.com and submitted by untamedlazyeye
image for Judge strikes down 1931 Michigan law criminalizing abortion

Comment on this story Comment Gift Article Share

DETROIT — A judge on Wednesday struck down Michigan’s 1931 anti-abortion law, months after suspending it, the latest development over abortion rights in a state where the issue is being argued in courtrooms and, possibly, at the ballot box. Wp Get the full experience. Choose your plan ArrowRight The law, which was long dormant before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June, violates the Michigan Constitution, said Judge Elizabeth Gleicher.

“A law denying safe, routine medical care not only denies women of their ability to control their bodies and their lives — it denies them of their dignity,” Gleicher of the Court of Claims wrote. “Michigan’s Constitution forbids this violation of due process.”

The decision comes as the Michigan Supreme Court is considering whether to place a proposed amendment on the Nov. 8 ballot that would add abortion rights to the state constitution. A Friday deadline is looming.

Supporters submitted more than 700,000 signatures, easily clearing the threshold. But a tie vote by the Board of State Canvassers over spacing issues on the petition has kept it off the ballot so far.

In the case handled by Gleicher, the 1931 law makes it a crime to perform an abortion unless the mother’s life is in danger.

The judge said the law “compels motherhood” and prevents a woman from determining the “shape of her present and future life.”

The law “forces a pregnant woman to forgo her reproductive choices and to instead serve as `an involuntary vessel entitled to no more respect than other forms of collectively owned property,’” Gleicher wrote, quoting constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe.

The law was suspended in May with an injunction, following a lawsuit by Planned Parenthood of Michigan. Gleicher said her latest decision applies to all state and local prosecutors. An appeal by the Republican-controlled Legislature is possible.

“The House is reviewing the ruling,” spokesman Gideon D’Assandro said.

Gleicher acknowledged in July that she has been a regular donor to Planned Parenthood and gave $1,000 to the 2018 campaigns of Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel, both Democrats who support abortion rights.

But that support wasn't a reason to pass the case to another judge, said Gleicher, who also serves as chief judge on the Michigan Court of Appeals.

“Judges are presumed to be unbiased and impartial,” she said.

In a separate lawsuit, Whitmer has repeatedly asked the state Supreme Court to bypass lower courts and settle the status of the 1931 law. The court hasn’t decided whether to intervene.

“With our rights still hanging by a thread, the Michigan Supreme Court needs to provide certainty,” the governor said Wednesday.

Find more AP coverage of the abortion issue: https://apnews.com/hub/abortion

The spelling of Laurence Tribe’s first name has been corrected.

partofbreakfast on September 7th, 2022 at 21:57 UTC »

This is hilarious timing, given that the Michigan supreme court is expected to rule on if the "protect abortion in the state constitution" ballot measure will actually go on the ballot in November or not.

TL;DR canvassers collected 750,000 signatures for it to be put on the ballot and they only needed about 450,000, but republicans have been trying to throw out the signatures as not being legit.

EDIT: for more fuckery, our Board of State Canvassers is set up to be 2 democrats and 2 republicans, and several other ballot proposals are locked up in the courts because of a 2-2 decision split on various technicalities. Here's what the ballot proposals are about:

1: Force state officials to accept election results, precluding the meddling with presidential vote outcomes 2: Require state-paid absentee ballot mailings and mandatory drop boxes 3: Bar voter photo-ID requirements 4: Prohibit post-election audits by anyone other than election officials.

And remember, this isn't people saying "these can't be laws", these are 2 individuals saying "we don't think people should even get the chance to vote on it". They could all still fail the vote in November, but Republicans don't want us to even have the chance to vote on it and our state courts have to take the time to review it and decide now.

LadyFoxfire on September 7th, 2022 at 21:29 UTC »

This is wonderful news, but I hope the state Supreme Court puts the abortion amendment back on the ballot so we can lock this decision in permanently.

thought_first on September 7th, 2022 at 18:52 UTC »

No Paywall version

"Manifestly, criminalizing abortion will eliminate access to a mainstay healthcare service. For 50 years, Michiganders have freely exercised the right to safely control their health and their reproductive destinies by deciding when and whether to carry a pregnancy to term. Eliminating abortion access will force pregnant women to forgo control of the integrity of their own bodies, regardless of the effect on their health and lives," Gleicher wrote in the opinion.

Common sense.

Fuck the GOP!