Another KS voter I see. The "Value them Both" crowd made sure to make the explanation of the constitutional amendment as difficult to understand as possible, in the hope to receive more yes votes. Just another example of the political right doing everything they can to have their way. I am glad to see the way your wife is voting.
Value them both is a proposition that removes constitutional inclusion of abortions. So if you vote YES, you are saying that you no longer want abortions to be a constitutional right.
Voting NO means you want abortions to remain as a constitutional right for Kansans.
Get out and vote on August 2nd, everyone!! This is an extremely important primary election.
![image showing [OC] My wife’s intentionally confusing ballot question, proposed as an amendment, for primaries.](75c9b050-babc-5f9b-a834-7cccbeaf7fcb.jpg)
Cankerato on July 28th, 2022 at 20:06 UTC »
Another KS voter I see. The "Value them Both" crowd made sure to make the explanation of the constitutional amendment as difficult to understand as possible, in the hope to receive more yes votes. Just another example of the political right doing everything they can to have their way. I am glad to see the way your wife is voting.
keboh on July 28th, 2022 at 20:56 UTC »
Howdy Kansas neighbor!
Some straight up bullshit phrasing for sure.
For anyone else in KS reading it:
Value them both is a proposition that removes constitutional inclusion of abortions. So if you vote YES, you are saying that you no longer want abortions to be a constitutional right.
Voting NO means you want abortions to remain as a constitutional right for Kansans.
Get out and vote on August 2nd, everyone!! This is an extremely important primary election.
issachikari on July 28th, 2022 at 21:17 UTC »
For those who are still confused, ignore everything else but this:
The Kansas constitution already protects abortion rights.
So do you want to remove protections from the constitution?
Yes or No.