The Four Lists China Wants the U.S. to Work On in Order to Improve Ties

Authored by newsweek.com and submitted by Spoonfeedme
image for The Four Lists China Wants the U.S. to Work On in Order to Improve Ties

When the top diplomats of China and the United States held their latest meeting over the weekend, Beijing passed along four lists of items that it wanted Washington to address in order to improve the present strained relations between the world's top two powers.

The exchange, first reported in a statement published Saturday by the Chinese Foreign Ministry, was confirmed Monday during a press briefing held by spokesperson Wang Wenbin, who offered some more insight into the contents of these demands conveyed by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

"They include the updated list of U.S. wrongdoings that must stop, and the updated list of key individual cases that the U.S. must resolve, which were first presented to the U.S. side at last year's meeting in Tianjin," Wang Wenbin told reporters. "The other two lists are the list of Acts in the 117th Congress of high concern to China and the list of cooperation proposals in eight areas including climate change, public health and people-to-people exchange."

Summarizing the details of these lists presented to President Joe Biden's administration on behalf of Chinese President Xi Jinping, Wang Wenbin said they "once again demonstrate China's serious position that the U.S. must stop exercising containment and suppression, stop interfering in China's internal affairs, and stop undermining China's sovereignty, security and development interests."

"The lists also reflect China's constructive attitude about conducting practical cooperation with the U.S. on the basis of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefits," he added. "We hope the U.S. side can take China's lists seriously, and take real actions to fulfill the commitments made by President Biden and the U.S. government."

Blinken did not address the four lists directly when speaking to reporters following his talks with Wang on Saturday, but he did say the two sides discussed areas "where more cooperation between our countries should be possible, including on the climate crisis, food security, global health, counter-narcotics," as well as "areas of disagreement and ways to manage and reduce risks," including on tensions over Taiwan, human rights concerns in Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Tibet, territorial disputes in the South China Sea and the status of U.S. citizens unable to leave China.

Blinken added that "despite the complexities of our relationship," he could "say with some confidence" that both parties found the talks "useful and constructive."

Newsweek has reached out to the State Department for comment.

The contents of the four lists have not been made publicly available in full, but past statements offered hints as to what exactly Beijing was asking of Washington.

After presenting the first two lists to U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman in Tianjin in July of last year, Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister Xie Feng said he and his colleagues had made a "clear stance on China-U.S. relations," and urged "the U.S. side to shift its extremely erroneous perception on China and its extremely dangerous policies toward China."

"The Chinese side has also again expressed its strong dissatisfactions with U.S. wrong statements and actions on such issues as novel coronavirus origin tracing, Taiwan, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and [the] South China Sea," Xie said at the time. "[China] has urged the U.S. side to immediately stop interfering in China's internal affairs, harming China's interests, stepping on red lines, playing with fire and engaging in group confrontation under the guise of values."

Directly addressing the "list of U.S. wrongdoings that must stop," Xie said that "the Chinese side has urged the U.S. side to unconditionally withdraw its visa restrictions on members of the Communist Party of China and their families, revoke sanctions against Chinese leaders, officials and government sectors and visa restrictions against Chinese students, to stop suppressing Chinese enterprises, troubling Chinese students and suppressing Confucius Institutes, to withdraw the registration of Chinese media as 'foreign agent' or 'foreign mission,' and to cancel the extradition of Meng Wanzhou."

It appears some progress has been made on certain asks over the course of the past year.

For example, in August, the Biden administration closed its official investigation into the origins of COVID-19 with an inconclusive finding among intelligence agencies on whether or not the disease more likely emerged naturally or from a lab such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The following month, an admission of guilt allowed Meng, CFO of Chinese telecom giant Huawei, to return home from her detainment in Canada over U.S. charges of fraudulent transactions made in an effort to dodge U.S. sanctions on Iran.

And after Biden and Xi's virtual summit in November, both sides agreed to extend the validity of visas granted to one another's journalists from three months to one year, and to allow them to depart and return without restrictions.

Many of the more recent strains in the U.S.-China relationship emerged under the administration of former President Donald Trump, and Chinese officials have made public their hopes of finding a better partner in Biden. But Republicans and Democrats alike have hardened their positions against Beijing in recent years, and have sought to pass an array of legislation designed to counter the People's Republic.

Among the most comprehensive of these measures was the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act, originally introduced as the Endless Frontier Act, which was framed as an ambitious effort to revamp U.S. funding for science and technology initiatives, especially in an effort to counter and compete with China. It was first passed by the Senate in June of last year, but has remained a source of protest for Beijing, which has criticized calls for sanctions on Chinese industries and support for those in Taiwan, a self-ruling island supported by the U.S. but claimed by China.

The bill is currently being weighed against the House of Representatives' America COMPETES Act of 2022, which includes similar provisions aimed at competing with China, and was most recently passed by the Senate in March. Conservatives have pushed for even harsher legislation against Beijing through proposals such as the Countering Communist China Act introduced by the House in July of last year.

One act concerning China that has since been signed into law is the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which was endorsed by Biden in December. The move sought to prevent the import of products manufactured under conditions the U.S. has described as a violation of human rights tied to China's policies toward the largely Muslim Uyghur minority in the northwestern Chinese province, where Beijing has long denied Washington's allegations of "genocide."

Even the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, part of Biden's $4 trillion American Jobs Plan and signed into law in November, scrutinized the potential role of labor practices in Xinjiang on the import of electric vehicle components, and restricted the use of funds for fiber optic cable and optical transmission equipment manufactured in China.

While the U.S. relationship with China has remained tense since Biden came to office nearly a year and a half ago, leaders from both sides have recognized the need to responsibly manage their dynamic. There has been a noticeable uptick in high-level engagements between the two leading nations in recent months, even as the U.S. remains wary of China's neutral stance on Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine.

In another sign of potential headway, U.S. officials have suggested they were seeking to reconfigure tariffs levied against China as part of a trade war launched under the Trump administration. The apparent shift came as Biden sought ways to combat inflation at home.

But geopolitical frictions remain a core obstacle to bringing about better U.S.-China ties, especially as the Biden administration showcased an "Indo-Pacific" strategy, widely viewed as a project to supplant the influence of Beijing in the region with that of Washington. Expanding ties with Taiwan were an especially sensitive issue, and have been discussed at length by Chinese officials.

Accusing Washington of supporting pro-"independence" forces in Taipei, People's Liberation Army Eastern Theater Command spokesperson Colonel Shi Yi announced Friday that Chinese forces held aerial and maritime exercises around Taiwan.

Meanwhile, the U.S. continues to lead the world's largest annual naval exercise, Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC), from which China was expelled in 2018.

U.S. Pacific Fleet commander Navy Admiral Samuel Paparo told a press briefing Saturday that the latest installation of the drills, which began late last month, "is not oriented against any particular nation-state actor."

At the same time, however, he did state that the training "does demonstrate the solidarity of all its participants to the international rules-based order and the principles of sovereignty, of freedom of the seas, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and against what otherwise would be expansionist activities."

locri on July 12nd, 2022 at 05:52 UTC »

Most of these demands require censorship since most of these issues are due to the beliefs of westerners, not official policy from any one government. This isn't something the west is set up for, the cultural effects of liberalism forbid it and westerners would naturally resist this as a foreign power trying to take over and control our thoughts and feelings.

Spoonfeedme on July 12nd, 2022 at 04:27 UTC »

I posted this article because after reading it, I couldn't help but feel some sense of dread when I thinking about future relations between these two countries. These discussions reminded me way too much of Japanese and America talks in the late 1930s and early 1940s.

One area of concern for me personally is to what extent do redditors think that if Russia and the Ukraine conflict continues to carry on, it may force China and Xi to make a decision about Taiwan sooner than they might otherwise want. Does the relative show of solidarity among many western nations through their support of Ukraine make it more or less likely he acts?

If China is counting on a stable Russia as a prerequisite for an intervention in Taiwan, supporting them now might make sense if the alternative is having to wait for however long it takes for the country to recover sufficiently to become a reliable supplier of resources. If Russia falls apart, I don't see how China could plausibly sustain her industrial and agricultural needs, most pressingly her fuel needs. A collapse of Russia will affect everyone who needs fuel and food of course, but without a secure overland fuel partner it seems unlikely China could sustain any prolonged escalation.

TLDR: I am worried Xi is going to pull the trigger sooner than we think.

Spoonfeedme on July 12nd, 2022 at 04:17 UTC »

Submission Statement:

This article, as the title suggests, reports on updated requests/demands from China in order to begin to improve relations between the two countries.

Although the exact nature of the list items is not disclosed, based on statements included in the article from Chinese Foreign Minister Xie Feng, the key areas that China wants corrective action can be summarized as:

1) Coronavirus speculation. 2) Supporting Taiwan 3) Trade discrimination against Xinjiang sourced producted. 4) Support of Hong Kong democracy activists/dissidents 5) South China Sea

The article goes on to give some background on some of the developments over the past couple of years, particularly around trade,