Sure, Impeach Clarence Thomas—but That’s Just for Starters

Authored by newrepublic.com and submitted by thenewrepublic
image for Sure, Impeach Clarence Thomas—but That’s Just for Starters

Impeachment proceedings begin in the House, which for the moment is in Democratic hands—but naturally, the vast majority of Democrats don’t want to talk about it. Even those who did talk about it made it all about the insurrection. When asked about calls to censure or impeach Thomas specifically, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler said: “It’s much too early to talk about either one of those. I think we have to wait and see what the Jan. 6 committee finds.”

This is standard Democratic can-kicking, playing defense instead of offense. What they need to be doing right now is shaming the conservative bloc with every tool at their disposal.

Because what’s the point here? The point is to prevent the court from doing to same-sex marriage and contraception and sexual privacy what it did to abortion, right? The only conceivable way to do that, until there’s a liberal majority on the court again, is to turn public opinion so strongly against the conservative majority that at least two of them see that overturning Obergefell and Griswold and Lawrence will destroy the court’s standing in a way that will lead to open defiance of its holdings and the eventual crumbling of our system of laws.

Vivaboyer on July 6th, 2022 at 03:52 UTC »

It takes a 2/3's vote in the US Senate to impeach a judge/justice.

Ask Republicans what they plan to do about him.

Thong_Doily on July 6th, 2022 at 00:44 UTC »

I’m just gonna stop you right here -

Justice Thomas’ decision to oversee a case involving his wife instead of recusing himself is a bigger fucking issue.

cachedcookies on July 5th, 2022 at 23:34 UTC »

Not enough votes in the Senate.