North Carolina charter school's skirt requirement for girls unconstitutional, court rules

Authored by reuters.com and submitted by Quantum_II
image for North Carolina charter school's skirt requirement for girls unconstitutional, court rules

June 14 (Reuters) - A North Carolina charter school's requirement that girls wear skirts based on the view that they are "fragile vessels" deserving of "gentle" treatment by boys is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 10-6 that Charter Day School violated three female students' equal protection rights by adopting the skirts policy based on gender stereotypes about the "proper place" for girls in society.

The school implemented a dress code that its founder, businessman Baker Mitchell, in an email and testimony said would "preserve chivalry" and ensure girls are treated "courteously and more gently than boys."

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com Register

The state-funded school in Brunswick County argued the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment did not apply to it because it was a private entity, not a "state actor."

But U.S. Circuit Judge Barbara Milano Keenan said it was one since North Carolina delegated to it its duty to provide free, universal education to students. A contrary ruling would mean North Carolina could ignore "blatant" discrimination, she said.

The Richmond, Virginia-based court also allowed the students to pursue a claim under Title IX, a federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in federally-funded education.

The ruling "is a victory for North Carolina’s students attending public charter schools, and should put charter schools across the country on notice that they must follow the same rules as traditional public schools when it comes to guaranteeing students’ equal educational opportunities," said Galen Sherwin, the students' lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union.

Aaron Streett, the school's attorney, called the ruling "mistaken and harmful," saying it contradicted U.S. Supreme Court precedent and "limits the ability of parents to choose the best education for their children."

The six dissenting votes were all from Republican-appointed judges.

Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Aurora Ellis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

suppersready90 on June 14th, 2022 at 22:02 UTC »

" A North Carolina charter school's requirement that girls wear skirts based on the view that they are "fragile vessels" deserving of "gentle" treatment by boys is unconstitutional, ..."

"The Brunswick County school emphasizes "traditional values" and implemented a dress code that its founder, businessman Baker Mitchell, said in an email and testimony would "preserve chivalry" and ensure girls are treated "courteously and more gently than boys."

Good grief that's straight out of the dark ages.

motavader on June 14th, 2022 at 22:01 UTC »

"The six dissenting votes were all from Republican-appointed judges, including U.S. Circuit Judge A. Marvin Quattlebaum Jr, who said the decision would stifle "innovative alternatives to traditional public education.""

Such a surprise! But seriously, if they take state dollars for education they should be responsible for upholding the same nondiscriminatory rules as state schools.

mordeci00 on June 14th, 2022 at 21:57 UTC »

Is this article from the 1940s?