S​outh Korea’s Supreme Court ​Issues Landmark Ruling on Gay Sex

Authored by nytimes.com and submitted by PeasKhichra
image for S​outh Korea’s Supreme Court ​Issues Landmark Ruling on Gay Sex

SEOUL — The Supreme Court of South Korea issued a landmark ruling against the military’s decades-old ban on homosexual activities on Thursday, striking down guilty verdicts for two male soldiers who were indicted on a charge of having consensual sex while off their base.

South Korea’s Military Criminal Act calls for up to two years in prison for “anal intercourse or other indecent acts.” Until now, ​soldiers engaged in such activities had been punished under that law regardless of whether there was mutual consent or where the conduct took place. Rights groups have long condemned the law​, saying it permits a “witch hunt” against gay soldiers.

​In its ruling on Thursday, the Supreme Court said that the law should not apply to consensual sex away from a military setting.

The two accused men, a first lieutenant and a master sergeant, were indicted on charges of breaking the military code after they were found to have had sex in a private house during off-duty hours in 2016. Lower military courts sentenced the lieutenant to four months in jail and the sergeant to three months; the sentences were suspended.

NeedlesslySwanky on April 22nd, 2022 at 15:22 UTC »

How do South Korean military courts work, compared to civilian courts? Was gay sex already legal for civilians?

Slow_Environment_782 on April 22nd, 2022 at 15:13 UTC »

Seems like a no brainer to me but ok 👏🏻

PeasKhichra on April 22nd, 2022 at 13:46 UTC »

SEOUL — The Supreme Court of South Korea issued a landmark ruling against the military’s decades-old ban on homosexual activities on Thursday, striking down guilty verdicts for two male soldiers who were indicted on a charge of having consensual sex while off their base.

South Korea’s Military Criminal Act calls for up to two years in prison for “anal intercourse or other indecent acts.” Until now, ​soldiers engaged in such activities had been punished under that law regardless of whether there was mutual consent or where the conduct took place. Rights groups have long condemned the law​, saying it permits a “witch hunt” against gay soldiers.

​In its ruling on Thursday, the Supreme Court said that the law should not apply to consensual sex away from a military setting. The two accused men, a first lieutenant and a master sergeant, were indicted on charges of breaking the military code after they were found to have had sex in a private house during off-duty hours in 2016. Lower military courts sentenced the lieutenant to four months in jail and the sergeant to three months; the sentences were suspended.

Punishing the two soldiers for this violated “their sexual autonomy” and “the constitutionally guaranteed right to equality and human dignity, as well as their right to pursue happiness,” the top court said on Thursday, sending the case back to a lower ​military ​court.

Human rights groups hailed the verdict, calling it “a major step forward” or “a huge victory” for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people.

“This groundbreaking decision is an important triumph in the fight against discrimination faced by L.G.B.T.I. people in South Korea,” said Boram Jang, Amnesty International’s East Asia researcher, in an emailed statement. “The criminalization of consensual same-sex sexual acts in South Korea’s military has long been a shocking violation of human rights, but today’s ruling should pave the way for military personnel to freely live their lives without the threat of prosecution.”

Lim Tae-hoon, head of the Seoul-based Center for Military Human Rights Korea, urged the country’s Constitutional Court to follow up by ruling the military code that outlaws gay sex unconstitutional. The court has ruled the law constitutional three times since 2002 and it is deliberating on the question for a fourth time. The South Korean military did not immediately comment on Thursday’s ruling. In the past it has said that it was not discriminating against gay soldiers. But it said it wanted to root out illegal homosexual activities and protect morale and discipline among soldiers.

Rights groups have long ​​lamented ​what they called the “archaic and discriminatory”​ military code and a pervasive stigmatization faced by L.G.B.T.I. people in the country in general and in the military in particular. The two soldiers were among a score of gay soldiers rounded up in 2017 on the suspicion of having same-sex relationships.​ ​