Starr County District Attorney Gocha Allen Ramirez said Sunday he has filed a motion to dismiss a murder charge against a woman for performing a "self-induced abortion."
Ramirez said the case stemmed from a report made to police by a local hospital in January.
The Starr County Sheriff's Office arrested 26-year-old Lizelle Herrera on Thursday and held her in custody on $500,000 bond. By Saturday night, Herrera was released from custody after an abortion rights advocacy fund posted bail on her behalf.
Ramirez said the Starr County Sheriff's Department "did their duty in investigating the incident brought to their attention by the reporting hospital” but this was not a criminal matter under Texas law.
"In reviewing applicable Texas law, it is clear that Ms. Herrera cannot and should not be prosecuted for the allegation against her." Ramirez said.
This is a dramatic turnaround from an indictment signed March 30, 2022, stating that Hererra “did then and there intentionally and knowingly cause the death of an individual J.A.H. by a self-induced abortion.”
The specifics and strength of the case against Hererra were murky from the start.
Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law, said that based on the information available, the murder charge didn’t make sense.
“The Texas murder statute does apply to the killing of an unborn fetus," he said, "but it specifically exempts cases where the person who terminated the fetus is the pregnant woman.”
Just now—Lizelle Herrera’s indictment and murder charge will be dismissed by the District Attorney in Starr County. https://t.co/FZx0KJIoEj — Pablo De La Rosa (@pblodlr) April 10, 2022
Vladeck said Herrera’s situation showed what will happen as legal protections around abortion crumble. “I think what this case really is, is an ominous portent of what things are going to look like on the ground in states that have aggressive abortion restrictions,” he added.
Jessica Brand, a former prosecutor and founder of the WREN Collective, a criminal justice nonprofit organization, agreed. “We've had a lot of wake up calls in Texas for how far people are willing to go to prosecute women to strip women of their rights,” she said.
Melissa Arjona, who co-founded South Texans for Reproductive Justice, said the arrest is a consequence of SB 8, which criminalized abortion as early as six weeks and deputized private citizens to sue anyone who provides an abortion or “aids and abets” a procedure.
“I mean, they criminalized pregnancy, basically, and abortion access," she said. "And so we knew something like this was bound to happen eventually.”
“The valley is kind of isolated from the rest of the state and we feel the impact pretty severely. So, yeah there’s a lot of desperation from these laws that are getting worse”
- Melissa Arjona, co-founder of South Texans for Reproductive Justice pic.twitter.com/wjWV2yIty9 — Carolina Cuellar Colmenares (@Wzrd_of_Lnlynss) April 9, 2022
While SB8 explicitly exempts pregnant women who get an abortion from criminal repercussions, it makes it nearly impossible to access abortion services in Texas, so many people are left with little to no legal options to terminate their pregnancy.
The controversial law went into effect in September 2021. As legal challenges make their way through the courts, thousands of Texans have gone out of state to get abortions.
“Criminalizing pregnant people’s choices or pregnancy outcomes, which the State of Texas has done, takes away people’s autonomy over their own bodies, and leaves them with no safe options when they choose not to become a parent," said Rockie Gonzalez, founder and board chair of Frontera Fund, which organized a protest on Hererra’s behalf outside the Starr County jail on Saturday.
“We want people to know that this type of legislation impacts low-income people of color communities the most when state legislators put restrictions on our reproductive rights,” Gonzalez told TPR.
Protestors are chanting for abortion rights and the release of Lizelle Herrera. @TPRNews pic.twitter.com/qxzhhnqhng — Carolina Cuellar Colmenares (@Wzrd_of_Lnlynss) April 9, 2022
Lynn Paltrow, executive director of National Advocates for Pregnant Women, said it was also troubling that this incident began with hospital staff making a report to police.
“We should not be living in a country where people who get pregnant are afraid to go for help at a hospital, because somebody there will turn them in or might turn them in, and it will result in arrest,” Paltrow told TPR.
“This is a disaster not only for any hope of equality, but also for public health. Because what these kinds of prosecutions do is frighten people away from hospitals when they need them from speaking honestly to their doctors when they need them.”
supagirl277 on April 10th, 2022 at 20:28 UTC »
Wait, so it wasn’t even an abortion?? They accused her of an intentional self-abortion. That could have been a miscarriage.
Blighted_Smile on April 10th, 2022 at 20:05 UTC »
Huh, so can she now be sued for $10k by everyone in the state?
From what her family stated, she had a stillbirth that was induced by the hospital. Whoever reported this probably didn't have access to her charts.
Sock_Sea on April 10th, 2022 at 18:40 UTC »
Statement from the DA's office: “Yesterday afternoon, I reached out to counsel for (name removed) to advise him that my office will be filing a motion dismissing the indictment against (name removed) Monday, April 11, 2022. In reviewing applicable Texas law, it is clear that (name removed) cannot and should not be prosecuted for the allegation against her. In reviewing this case, it is clear that the Starr County Sheriff’s Department did their duty in investigating the incident brought to their attention by the reporting hospital. To ignore the incident would have been a dereliction of their duty. Prosecutorial discretion rests with the District Attorney’s office, and in the State of Texas a prosecutor’s oath is to do justice. Following that oath, the only correct outcome to this matter is to immediately dismiss the indictment against (name removed). Although with this dismissal (name removed) will not face prosecution for this incident, it is clear to me that the events leading up to this indictment have taken a toll on (name removed) and her family. To ignore this fact would be shortsighted. The issues surrounding this matter are clearly contentious, however based on Texas law and the facts presented, it is not a criminal matter. Going forward, my office will continue to communicate with counsel for (name removed) in order to bring this matter to a close. It is my hope that with the dismissal of this case it is made clear that (name removed) did not commit a criminal act under the laws of the State of Texas.”
Edited to remove the innocent woman's name. Even though it's in news articles, I don't want to contribute to her name being spread around.