Buffalo, N.Y., police officers cleared of wrongdoing after shoving elderly man to ground at protest

Authored by cbc.ca and submitted by Covert_Cuttlefish

An arbitrator has ruled that two police officers in Buffalo, N.Y., didn't violate the department's use-of-force guidelines when they pushed a 75-year-old protester to the ground in June 2020, during racial injustice protests following the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

The episode drew national attention when a news crew captured video of Martin Gugino being shoved by officers Robert McCabe and Aaron Torgalski in downtown Buffalo, as crowd control officers in riot gear cleared demonstrators for an 8 p.m. curfew.

Gugino, who was pushed backward, started bleeding after hitting his head on the pavement and spent about a month in hospital with a fractured skull and brain injury.

Buffalo police initially said in a statement that a person "was injured when he tripped and fell," before video of the incident was made public.

In a decision Friday, arbitrator Jeffrey Selchick wrote, "Upon review, there is no evidence to sustain any claim that Respondents [police officers] had any other viable options other than to move Gugino out of the way of their forward movement."

Gugino lies on the ground after he was shoved by police officers in Buffalo, hitting his head on the pavement, on June 4, 2020. (Jamie Quinn/Reuters)

The level of force used by the officers was justified because Gugino refused to comply with orders to leave the scene, was acting erratically and walked directly in front of McCabe, according to Selchick.

"The use of force employed by Respondents reflected no intent on their part to do more than to move Gugino away from them," he wrote.

McCabe and Torgalski were suspended without pay and arrested within days of the incident, but last year a grand jury declined to indict them and charges were dropped.

A lawyer for Gugino, who has sued the city, told the Buffalo News that the ruling has no bearing on the lawsuit.

"We are not aware of any case where this arbitrator has ruled against on-duty police officers, so his ruling here on behalf of the police was not only expected by us but was certainly expected by the union and city who selected and paid him," Melissa Wischerath told the newspaper.

WATCH | Elderly man shoved and injured by Buffalo police in incident caught on video. Warning: This video contains graphic content: GRAPHIC CONTENT WARNING: Elderly man shoved and injured by Buffalo police in incident caught on video Duration 0:35 The man was at a protest that was nearing its end when he was pushed by police and hit his head on the sidewalk. Two police officers have been suspended. 0:35

Police Commissioner Joseph Gramaglia said in a statement that he will reinstate the two officers to duty on Monday, the newspaper reported.

Email messages seeking comment were left on Sunday with a lawyer representing the city, which argued for the disciplinary charges, and with the Buffalo police union.

rubioburo on April 11st, 2022 at 02:21 UTC »

Since it’s arbitration, is it final and binding? Why is this arbitration and not in court? Anyone knows this?

Edit: found the answer, it’s just for the police dept and union. The lawsuit is separate and has nothing to do with this.

underwear11 on April 11st, 2022 at 00:54 UTC »

Emphasis mine

"We are not aware of any case where this arbitrator has ruled against on-duty police officers, so his ruling here on behalf of the police was not only expected by us but was certainly expected by the union and city who selected and paid him,"

Well, that explains it.

Edit: I should clarify that this was between the city and union so they were always going to pay him. They specifically selected this arbitrator because he never ruled against the police. It attempts to save face for everyone.

Ars3nal11 on April 10th, 2022 at 22:32 UTC »

In a decision Friday, arbitrator Jeffrey Selchick wrote, "Upon review, there is no evidence to sustain any claim that Respondents [police officers] had any other viable options other than to move Gugino out of the way of their forward movement."

‘Move him out of the way’ is expert-level double speak.