Ohio Republicans Would Rather Impeach a Judge than Stop Cheating at Elections

Authored by rollingstone.com and submitted by jeanbaptistegrenouil
image for Ohio Republicans Would Rather Impeach a Judge than Stop Cheating at Elections

Shortly after the Ohio Supreme Court ruled — for the third time — that GOP-approved legislative maps unconstitutionally favored Republicans over Democrats, Republicans in the state house are considering impeaching the court’s chief justice, The Columbus Dispatch reported Friday.

Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor cast the deciding vote earlier this week in a 4-3 ruling that found that the maps violated redistricting rules voters approved in 2015.

“The evidence shows that the individuals who controlled the map-drawing process exercised that control with the overriding intent to maintain as much of an advantage as possible for members of their political party,” the majority’s opinion read.

O’Connor, a Republican, also sided with the court’s liberal wing earlier this year in tossing out Republican-backed congressional maps after deciding that districts were gerrymandered to the GOP’s advantage.

Now, rather than take the court’s advice and “retain an independent map drawer…to draft a plan through a transparent process,” some Republican legislators are discussing invoking their power to impeach the judge, who will step down at the end of the year due to the court’s age limits.

According to an email from a Republican state central committee member that was obtained by the Dispatch, an unnamed lawmaker intends onto file an impeachment charge against the judge. A statehouse insider told the outlet that this could come in the next few days.

“I don’t know if it moves or not,” this person said. “Judging by conversations I’m aware of, there is growing support for this move. I don’t know if there’s enough.”

Rep. Scott Wiggam on Thursday made clear where he stands. “It’s time to impeach Maureen O’Connor now,” he wrote on Twitter.

It's time to impeach Maureen O'Connor now. — Rep. Scott Wiggam (@Scott_Wiggam) March 17, 2022

But Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican who serves on the GOP-controlled Ohio Redistricting Commission, said he opposes such a move.

“No matter what we think of that (redistricting) opinion, this is an extraordinary measure to take,” DeWine said Friday, according to the Dispatch. “I don’t think we want to go down that pathway because we disagree with a decision by a court, because we disagree with a decision by an individual judge or justice – not a good idea.”

An impeachment would require the support of at least 50 of the state’s 99 representatives. (64 of them are Republicans.) A vote to convict would require two-thirds of the vote in the Senate. (Republicans in that body have 25 of 33 seats.)

An impeachment of O’Connor would not only signal to Ohioans that Republicans will happily thumb their nose at fair elections, but it could also inspire members of the GOP to follow suit in other states such as North Carolina, where the state’s highest court also struck down GOP-friendly maps.

ohiotechie on March 19th, 2022 at 02:32 UTC »

As a citizen of this state I’m beyond furious about this. The citizens of this state passed a constitutional amendment by overwhelming margins to stop gerrymandering by creating a panel to define districts instead of using the legislature and the goddamn GOP has steadfastly ignored what the people want and have attempted time and time again to jam their bullshit map down the states throat. The truly sad part about this is it won’t hurt them politically at all. This used to be a really great place to live; it’s a goddamn shame what’s happened here.

Gibbons74 on March 19th, 2022 at 01:20 UTC »

To impeach a judge in Ohio you need 50% of the house, over 50% of the house in Ohio are republicans. You need 2/3 of the Senate exactly 75% of the Ohio Senate are republicans. They have the Republicans to do it it's just a matter of whether all those Republicans will vote to do it.

After that the next set of maps that goes to the Ohio Supreme Court would then not be found unconstitutional because it would be a three to three decision at that point.

So basically the current gerrymander districts in Ohio can take control of the Supreme Court in Ohio anytime a judge rules against their favor and then enact their own gerrymandered maps to keep that control for as long as a few people over 50% are voting republican in Ohio.

Edit: 75% of Ohio Senate are republicans, not 66.6%.

wish1977 on March 19th, 2022 at 00:59 UTC »

They don't even try to hide their cheating ways.