Sinema kills chance for filibuster change: I won’t ‘worsen the underlying disease of division’

Authored by independent.co.uk and submitted by Edward_Fingerhands

Sen Kyrsten Sinema ripped apart Democratic voters’ hopes of seeing changes to the filibuster that would allow voting rights legislation to pass in a speech on Thursday that reiterated her support for both the legislation itself and the 60-vote threshold that is keeping its passage an impossibility.

In a floor speech, the Arizona Democrat portrayed the Senate’s rule allowing members to block debate on legislation with a 41-vote minority as a necessary tool for safeguarding democracy in a time of unprecedented political divisions.

“I strongly support, and will continue to vote for legislative responses to these state laws,” said the senator.

But, she added: "I will not support separate actions that worsen the underlying disease of division infecting our country."

“Eliminating the 60-vote threshold on a party line with the thinnest of possible majorities to pass these bills that I support will not guarantee that we prevent demagogues from winning office,” said the senator.

Her decision means that just about all major legislation is out of reach for Senate Democrats until the 2022 midterms at the very least, when Democrats could expand their control over the chamber or, possibly more likely, see it fall into Republican hands.

It also means that the legislation being pushed by Democrats to reform voting systems around the country and cut back on various GOP attempts to restrict actions such as voting by mail or assisting those in line to vote with food or water is dead. Activists have warned for months that the legislation is necessary to prevent a cementing of Republican control around the country launched in response to the 2020 election in which the GOP saw President Joe Biden win two states, Georgia and Arizona, that are typically won by Republicans.

Ms Sinema reiterated her support for voting rights legislation to address those Republican-led efforts to restrict voting on Thursday, and described efforts by GOP state legislatures expected to make voting harder for many Americans part of a “larger, more deeper problem facing our democracy”. Such laws, she said, have “no place” in a fair and functioning system.

Despite that condemnation, her remarks are likely to cause an escalation of activists’ efforts to persuade her and Sen Joe Manchin, a fellow holdout Democrat, on the issue as the legislation’s backers have said in interviews that the legislation must pass by the end of January to have immediate and noticeable effects on the 2022 midterms.

A group of more than two dozen Black faith leaders are currently hunger striking in support of the legislation’s passage and reform of the filibuster, and a separate group of Arizona-based student activists are expected to resume their own hunger strike following Ms Sinema’s comments.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris went down to Georgia earlier this week for national addresses on the issue of voting rights where Mr Biden decried GOP opponents of the legislation as on the side of Jim Crow figures like former Gov George Wallace and Jefferson Davis.

Republicans’ “endgame” was to “ turn the will of the voters into a mere suggestion — something states can respect or ignore,” Mr Biden said on Tuesday.

The speech infuriated Republicans in the Senate, making it all the more unlikely that any will support his voting rights push, and appeared to have little to no effect on Ms Sinema’s position which has been major issue of division between the senator and others in her own party for months.

paperbackgarbage on January 13rd, 2022 at 18:08 UTC »

CUT TO:

January 2010

US Rep, Kyrsten Sinema, trying to make fun of Joe Lieberman as the "60th vote" to override the filibuster (for passing the ACA, at that time).

"Well, the Senate? We no longer have 60 votes. Some would argue that we never had 60, because one of those was Joseph Lieberman. But, that's....whatever. And Nelson too...but LIEBERMAN. (chuckles) So now, as the president had so eloquently said on Wednesday, there's none of this pressure, this false pressure to get to 60....so what that means is that the Democrats can stop KOW-TOWING to Joe Lieberman, and instead seek other avenues to move forward with health reform.

So, it's likely that the Senate will move forward with a process called RECONCILIATON, which takes only 51 votes. And, by the way, is not unusual. You may recall, that, before the Democrats took the Senate in 2008, the Republicans controlled the Senate for quite some time (in fact, since around 1994)....they NEVER had 60 votes, and they managed to do a LOT of really bad things in that time. SO, the Reconciliation process is still quite available, and we'll use it for good instead of evil. (pause for applause)"

Infidel8 on January 13rd, 2022 at 18:08 UTC »

Who gives a fuck if she rhetorically supports the voting rights bill when she's standing on the floor ensuring that it dies?

Lolwutgeneration on January 13rd, 2022 at 17:56 UTC »

I can't wrap my head around the lack of support for a 'standing filibuster'.

Want to maintain the process? Make people freaking work for it, opposition should be visible and right now it just isn't. Right now the Senate effectively works with a 60 vote threshold on practically every bill and there's zero visibility on who/why something is being blocked.

Get rid of this stupid silent filibuster, let the people see who is creating roadblocks and force them to explain their reasoning.