Elizabeth Warren slams Elon Musk's 'person of the year' title, saying the tax code should be changed so he stops 'freeloading off everyone else'

Authored by businessinsider.com and submitted by Dull_Tonight
image for Elizabeth Warren slams Elon Musk's 'person of the year' title, saying the tax code should be changed so he stops 'freeloading off everyone else'

Sen. Elizabeth Warren slammed Elon Musk's new title as TIME's person of the year.

She said he should stop "freeloading" and pay his fair share in taxes as the world's richest person.

Musk is worth $297 billion, but managed to pay $0 in federal income tax in 2018.

Get a daily selection of our top stories based on your reading preferences. Loading Something is loading. Email address By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren isn't pleased with Elon Musk's designation as TIME's 2021 person of the year.

Musk, who is worth $297 billion, has vocally opposed government involvement in his wealth — something Warren and other progressive lawmakers have slammed given his avoidance in paying what they say is his fair share in taxes. While Warren's proposal to impose a 2% tax on household net worth has not yet come to fruition, she has been a staunch advocate of taxing the wealthy and didn't hold back on Monday, after TIME announced Musk's new title.

"Let's change the rigged tax code so The Person of the Year will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else," Warren wrote on Twitter.

She also shared a new TIME cover created by Americans for Tax Fairness with the words "TAX ME" placed over a photo of Musk, alongside text that said Musk paid $0 in federal income tax in 2018.

A recent ProPublica investigation found Musk, and others in his tax bracket, did not pay federal taxes as of 2018 because they did not have income, only assets. That's why Musk has strongly opposed Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden's "billionaire's tax," which would tax wealthy people's assets.

As Insider's Juliana Kaplan previously reported, taxing billionaire's would raise $557 over a decade, per an analysis from the Joint Committee on Taxation, and Musk would be on the hook for $50 billion in taxes for the first five years.

"This makes crystal clear the extent to which the tax code is simply not equipped to tax billionaires fairly, or ensure they pay any taxes at all," Wyden said in an October statement. "Working Americans like nurses and firefighters are rightly disgusted by the status quo."

Musk responded to Wyden's proposal at the time, saying on Twitter: "Eventually, they run out of other people's money and then they come for you."

As Insider reported, Musk does not want the government to lay a hand on his fortune even though government subsidies helped him grow that fortune. The government provided subsidies to Tesla, his electric vehicle company, along with a $2.89 billion contract for his aerospace company, SpaceX, to land "commercial" humans on the moon.

Even so, Musk said he opposed that kind of help from the government in his interview with TIME.

"They're basically saying they want control of the assets," Musk said. "This does not result in, actually, the good of the people. You want those who are managing capital to be good stewards of capital. And I think the government is inherently not a good steward of capital."

lillyrose2489 on December 13rd, 2021 at 20:28 UTC »

Anyone else no longer willing to even read an article when the headline contains the word "slams?" I await with great excitement the days when headlines just go back to things like "Elizabeth Warren criticizes..." or simply "Elizabeth Warren responds to..."

Do not understand how we consider this sort of inflammatory or dramatic headline good journalism. I swear Business Insider is one of the worst at their over the top headlines.

BoogerSmoke on December 13rd, 2021 at 19:59 UTC »

It’s all well and good to point to specific, ridiculous outliers so us common folk can get all riled up. But hell…I’m guessing that he has a team of accountants that follow the law and figure out the best way to file his taxes. It’s not his fault our tax law is ineffective at taxing wealth. Further, the bulk of his wealth probably isn’t even realized. It’s likely mostly in Tesla stock. There are laws about all of this stuff. If they know the problem then fix those laws instead of harassing individuals.

CeeArthur on December 13rd, 2021 at 18:35 UTC »

Just a reminder that Time's 'Person of the Year' means simply the person was the most newsworthy in that year. Hitler was given it in 1938