Biden declines Trump request to withhold White House records from Jan. 6 committee

Authored by nbcnews.com and submitted by BrexitBlaze

WASHINGTON — The White House on Friday formally blocked an attempt by former President Donald Trump to withhold documents from Congress related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, setting up a legal showdown between the current and former presidents over executive privilege.

In a letter to the National Archives obtained by NBC News, White House Counsel Dana Remus rejected an attempt by Trump’s attorneys to withhold documents requested by the House Select Committee regarding the then-president’s activities on Jan. 6, writing that “President Biden has determined that an assertion of executive privilege is not in the best interests of the United States, and therefore is not justified as to any of the documents.”

“These are unique and extraordinary circumstances,” Remus added. “Congress is examining an assault on our Constitution and democratic institutions provoked and fanned by those sworn to protect them, and the conduct under investigation extends far beyond typical deliberations concerning the proper discharge of the President’s constitutional responsibilities. The constitutional protections of executive privilege should not be used to shield, from Congress or the public, information that reflects a clear and apparent effort to subvert the Constitution itself.”

White House press secretary Jen Psaki had telegraphed the move two weeks ago, saying President Joe Biden had already concluded that it would not be appropriate to assert executive privilege related to Jan. 6 requests. But White House officials added that they had not yet done so related to requests from the Select Committee, and would make any determinations on a case-by-case basis.

The White House now is authorizing the National Archives to turn over an initial batch of documents that fell under a broad category requested by the committee, covering Trump’s actions and communications on Jan. 6, including his rally at The Ellipse on White House grounds, and subsequent meetings and communications throughout the day.

That request sought everything from Twitter messages, phone and visitor logs, and any videos and photos of events he participated in. It also included documents and communications related to then-Vice President Mike Pence’s movements and security, and broadly any other documents referring to the rally at The Ellipse and the subsequent violent riot at the Capitol, as well as to planning around the ceremonial event of counting of electoral votes during a joint session of Congress.

According to a source familiar with the matter, the National Archives immediately began scouring records in its possession for items responsive to the committee’s request issued in August. It has been producing relevant documents both to Trump’s legal representatives and the Biden White House on a regular basis since then. The specific batch of documents in question were initially produced to both parties on Sept. 8.

A White House official could not characterize what specific documents are included in that set, beyond saying that they will shed light on certain events within the White House on Jan. 6. They said Trump’s representatives concluded that executive privilege should be asserted on some, but not all of the documents. But Biden has concluded privilege does not pertain to any of the records.

Remus says in her letter that the White House is continuing to review other materials the archives have provided since then, and will respond “at an appropriate time.”

Trump, in a lengthy statement, sharply criticized the probe and accused Democrats of attempting "to use Congress to persecute their political opponents."

"Their requests are not based in law or reality — it's just a game to these politicians," he said.

After issuing the statement, Trump formally asserted executive privilege over the documents requested by the committee. Trump highlighted roughly 40 records that he objects to being released, and also said he preemptively asserts executive privilege over others in the request that he hasn’t had time to review, citing a 1996 Justice Department legal opinion.

The National Archives now has to formally notify the White House of Trump's assertion, and it’s highly likely that Biden will again reject it, which could prompt a legal challenge from Trump.

White House officials told NBC News on Friday they were anticipating the assertion, as Remus indicated in her earlier letter. The administration is also expected to reiterate the waiver of privilege in a new letter, officials said.

Under federal law, former presidents ask the current president to withhold any documents created during previous administrations, which are held by the National Archives. Trump’s next step would be filing a lawsuit against the archives, but he faces long legal odds.

The courts have never definitively said how much authority former presidents have to assert the privilege once they’re out of office. But as a practical matter, the views of the current president carry considerable weight. The Supreme Court ruled in 1977 that the incumbent president “is in the best position to assess the present and future needs of the Executive Branch.”

What’s more, the privilege is not absolute. Courts apply a balancing test in deciding whether it should apply.

The Supreme Court also said the privilege is limited to communications “in performance of [a president’s] responsibilities,” which might not cover discussions of how to get the Justice Department to undermine confidence in the election results.

Qubeye on October 8th, 2021 at 21:32 UTC »

For anyone confused or unsure, here's a few pieces of information that are relevant.

Executive privilege is not in the Constitution, nor is it laid out anywhere else legally except in a single SCOTUS ruling.

It only applies to stuff within the executive. Individuals who are not within the executive don't apply here (e.g. Bannon, Insurrectionists, etc who are not in communication with the executive).

It definitely does not apply to individuals in the Legislative branch who communicated with the Executive branch, e.g. texts between Congresspersons who aided and abetted.

It absolutely fucking does not apply if the requested documents and testimony are "essential to the justice of the case." (This is the precise text of the SCOTUS ruling.)

On Point #4, if Congress is investigating Trump's involvement with an attempted coup, then Trump's correspondence by its very nature is required for justice to prevail here.

Schiffy94 on October 8th, 2021 at 19:42 UTC »

Really can't imagine why Trump thought such a request would work.

Loreander1211 on October 8th, 2021 at 18:44 UTC »

So Trump is admitting Biden is President by making this request in the first place? That is news!